site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

bemis

join:2008-07-18
Reading, MA
Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon FiOS

reply to r81984

Re: Retirement

said by r81984:

How can you expect a company to afford to pay for workers who no longer work for them? Workers who make them no money at all?

Let me just say that I am with you--I am against continued pensions now that it's plainly clear they are an unsustainable future nightmare for employers.

But the thing is that these companies did promise pensions to these workers and it would not be right to take them away. I think however that the unions need to accept this situation and work out some sort of a deal.

Any active employee with over 5 years of service keeps their arrangement. Active employee with less than 5 years gets a lump sum put into a 401K or other retirement account. Those same under-5 employees and new employees get an employer provided contribution either as a base contribution or a match.

For reference my employer will put 2% as long as a "match" if I put in 6%...

My health case "option" (is it really an option if your choice is that or nothing?) is a high deductible plan. In essence what I have is a catastrophic-coverage plan because I am responsible for 100% of the first $2,000 of my health costs per year, then 20% of them up to a max yearly out of pocket of $10,000.

My job required a technical college degree (electronics). I receive no bonus. My salary would be considered at the very low end of average given the number of years of experience I have.

So it seems like Verizon union workers probably have quite a lot of things to "give up" before they are down to what I believe is a relatively common private sector job.


r81984
Fair and Balanced
Premium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX
Reviews:
·row44
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T DSL Service

4 edits

said by bemis:

said by r81984:

How can you expect a company to afford to pay for workers who no longer work for them? Workers who make them no money at all?

Let me just say that I am with you--I am against continued pensions now that it's plainly clear they are an unsustainable future nightmare for employers.

But the thing is that these companies did promise pensions to these workers and it would not be right to take them away. I think however that the unions need to accept this situation and work out some sort of a deal.

Any active employee with over 5 years of service keeps their arrangement. Active employee with less than 5 years gets a lump sum put into a 401K or other retirement account. Those same under-5 employees and new employees get an employer provided contribution either as a base contribution or a match.

For reference my employer will put 2% as long as a "match" if I put in 6%...

My health case "option" (is it really an option if your choice is that or nothing?) is a high deductible plan. In essence what I have is a catastrophic-coverage plan because I am responsible for 100% of the first $2,000 of my health costs per year, then 20% of them up to a max yearly out of pocket of $10,000.

My job required a technical college degree (electronics). I receive no bonus. My salary would be considered at the very low end of average given the number of years of experience I have.

So it seems like Verizon union workers probably have quite a lot of things to "give up" before they are down to what I believe is a relatively common private sector job.

My company gives everyone 3% into their 401K no matter what then they match up to 6%.
So I put in 6% and my company puts in 9%.
That is for all workers from janitor to CEO.

The only bad thing about a 401K is the management fees which should be illegal. Wallstreet is getting rich off all our retirement saving even if they lose all our money.
My company has one unmanaged s&p matching fund that has like .5% management fee. All the other funds have like 2 to 3% management fees.

The government needs to outlaw management fees for your 401K. I understand there is costs invovled, but 401k management fees should be a flat fee per year and not a %. The flat fee should be only a few dollars a year and the fee should be 0 if you lose money in your fund.

It is a joke that wallstreet gets to steal from our retirement plans. They basically should only be breaking even from 401K plans in management costs and costs should be forced to be low so they cant try to use 401K plans fees to pay for their entire company.

Oddly enough the same stock companies that benefits greatly from our 401K plan fees also rate your employers stock as buy or sell. Huge conflict of interest.
401K stock management companies should 100% independent from any other stock company.
--
...brought to you by Carl's Jr.

Saturday, 25-May 10:33:23 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics