 LightSPremium
join:2005-12-17
Greenville, TX | Well.... You know, to be honest, I'm not surprised.
One way fails, try another... |
|
Donut
join:2005-06-27
Romulus, MI | The only thing place that the feds cant get is in your own head. At least YET.
--
Mr. Donut
|
|
| well, they can't get you this way if you have no cell phone! |
|
Kamus
join:2011-01-27
El Paso, TX | reply to Donut
said by Donut:The only thing place that the feds cant get is in your own head. At least YET.
That is right... in a few decades computers will be so small that they will fit inside our cells. At that point there is no technical reason for them to literally be in your head. |
|
|
|
| reply to nasadude
Right! No cell phone, car with license plate (automated readers), EZ-Pass, credit card for payment, or an uncovered face. You make it sound like it's just soooo easy to get around pervasive surveillance isn't it?
So really what they're saying is there's no reason the government shouldn't know where every citizen is at all times. Yeah, like, anyone should be just fine with that??? |
|
LightSPremium
join:2005-12-17
Greenville, TX | reply to Donut
Ever read 1984?
That book is a decent prospector of what could eventually be... and, they for sure get in everyones head.  |
|
Reviews:
 ·Callcentric
| reply to LightS
It's amazing how so many in this country are paranoid about government and law enforcement. We have the highest rates of violence, murder, and corruption in the developed world people, which needs to be addressed.
Not to mention, American after American is being sued, harassed, or our every move recorded daily by the private sector, yet we continue to be fixated with tin-foil conspiracy theories about government. |
|
| said by Telco:It's amazing how so many in this country are paranoid about government and law enforcement. We have the highest rates of violence, murder, and corruption in the developed world people, which needs to be addressed.
Not to mention, American after American is being sued, harassed, or our every move recorded daily by the private sector, yet we continue to be fixated with tin-foil conspiracy theories about government.
Why are you against privacy? Do you have a monetary interest in our lives? |
|
Reviews:
 ·Charter
| Read telcos posts. He's a liberal cheerleader, you'll notice on his posts he will jump on bashing republicans any chance he gets. If this was about a republican he would've bashed them.
This isn't about freedom, he needs to ra ra for a liberal. |
|
KearnstdElf WizardPremium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ | reply to Telco
said by Telco:It's amazing how so many in this country are paranoid about government and law enforcement. We have the highest rates of violence, murder, and corruption in the developed world people, which needs to be addressed.
Not to mention, American after American is being sued, harassed, or our every move recorded daily by the private sector, yet we continue to be fixated with tin-foil conspiracy theories about government.
because we know the private sector is hoarding the information for profit and can be held liable if their data mining piles get out into the public with our private data.
The government on the other hand has the shittiest security short of a screen door on a secret lab. if it must be secured you cannot trust the government to secure it. the FBI iphones leak, many other data leaks, the nun who walked right into that nuclear weapons facility. Outside of Fort Knox they could not secure a bunker or a computer in said bunker. And worst of all they have no liability for keeping their data piles secure.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
| reply to LightS
Revelation 13:17
so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name
--
Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty - Ronald Reagan |
|
LightSPremium
join:2005-12-17
Greenville, TX Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by footballdude:Revelation 13:17
so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name
I'm not religious, soo... |
|
rradina
join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO | reply to Telco
I'm not against law enforcement and I want them to do all they can to make us safe. I'm also not against big business and corporations making lots of money. I'm not against necessary government getting involved in certain services because that's the most feasible/efficient approach.
I feel like a broken record on this because I say it so often but well all need rules. Do rules sometimes make it harder to do the right thing? Sure. But as we I hope we all believe, it's better to let a guilty man go free than send someone to prison who is innocent. There is no exception to this rule. The moment any of us truly believe this kind of collateral damage is acceptable, those who seek to undermine the freedoms we enjoy, have won.
It's absurd for the the government to believe the public has no right to expect privacy regarding data collected by cell carriers. HIPAA has made it quite clear that we can expect the utmost privacy regarding medical records. In fact, HIPAA has gone so overboard that parents of 12 year old children can be billed and liable for the services they receive (they are, after all, minors) but they cannot, without the child's express permission, get access to the procedures performed. Nor can the doctor reveal anything the child discusses with them. Now that's what I call PRIVACY. |
|
