Santa Monica, CA
said by jjeffeory:"Much better", but not cheaper, which is what counts for the majority of subscribers. Again, look at the VZ data - they can't achieve more than 33% uptake for their "cherry-picked" "much better" service.
This is a great deal from Google; it is soooo funny that you've flipped against a business and are trying to take Google to task for being too expensive! Very entertaining!
I would say that what Google offers is much better than TWC for sure. Google's shortcomings will be addressed, but TWC has yet to address their problems. Anyway, interesting!
Google's TV package is not "better", and is very much overpriced, and the local MSO(s) will respond long enough to counter them.