republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

reply to Metatron2008

Re: Apple now wants the Galaxy S3 and 10.1 Note banned

One thing I will say is that it is my opinion that Apple nore the Courts should have any right to prevent Samsung from selling its devices. force them to resolve maybe but the only thing a sales ban does is stifle consumer choice and consumer choice should always be paramount to all because the people are more important than look and feel patents always.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports


skeechan
Ai Otsukaholic
Premium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Cox HSI
·Clear Wireless

Apple shouldn't but the courts absolutely should as that is the only remedy. Intellectual property rights must be paramount, otherwise consumers wind up no choice or mediocre products because companies won't invest in the R&D if they know it will just get knocked off the next day and will lack the revenues to pay back their investment.

That isn't to say that vague idea's should be patentable but merely that customer's won't have a choice if no one spends billions, takes the risks and makes the stuff in the first place.

What needs to happen is the verdict set aside and a new trial where the jury gets to actually see all of the evidence including the prior art evidence. THEN with all of the evidence if they say Sammy copied, Sammy is busted, if they don't, they don't but at least you know it was a FAIR trial.


Saturday, 18-May 09:23:23 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics