site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
86
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


n2jtx

join:2001-01-13
Glen Head, NY

A Reason To Oppose It

Frankly, if the carriers such as AT&T, Verizon and Sprint support it (I noted that Verizon was not mentioned in this particular article but in another) then it is definitely bad news for the taxpayer. I guess they are all hoping it will be as badly run as the USF and that all they need to do is collect the money, apply it to their profit sheet and never lift one finger to do any real work.

Of course with the do nothing congress, I cannot see them summoning up the votes to block it.
--
I support the right to keep and arm bears.

Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

said by n2jtx:

Frankly, if the carriers such as AT&T, Verizon and Sprint support it (I noted that Verizon was not mentioned in this particular article but in another) then it is definitely bad news for the taxpayer.

Not only that but if AT&T and Verizon are supporting this tax it is a certainty the money is not going where it is needed the most.

Sunday, 19-May 01:36:42 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics