 | I Doubt that Her "Expert" Will Even be Allowed to Tes She needs expert testimony to back this claim. In order for the expert to be qualified, he/she has to meet the Daubert standard which means that there are clinical studies or scientifically reliable studies to back this. California is a Daubert jurisdiction.
An errant expert is not enough and anecdotal evidence is not enough.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_standard
In 100 years, she might have the experts (but the statute of limitations would have run). Today, I don't think she does.
I'm also wondering whether Santa Monica has governmental immunity. Then again, the attorney who unsuccessfully sued Mel Gibson over hidden anti-semetic messages in the movie Drive is the first cousin of my old boss and a once a year sushi buddy. |