republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
398
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


not

@comcast.net

Latency

Sat's inherently slow latency will always make satellite ISP service horrible. No one in their right mind should be using it.


Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Longport, NJ
kudos:5

said by not :

Sat's inherently slow latency will always make satellite ISP service horrible. No one in their right mind should be using it.

It is better than dial-up unless playing online games or VOIP services.
--
»www.mittromney.com/s/repeal-and-···bamacare
»www.mittromney.com/issues/health-care


antdude
A Ninja Ant
Premium,VIP
join:2001-03-25
United State
kudos:4
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

said by Linklist:

said by not :

Sat's inherently slow latency will always make satellite ISP service horrible. No one in their right mind should be using it.

It is better than dial-up unless playing online games or VOIP services.

Unless they can get WISP?

clarknova156

join:2011-06-04
Poughkeepsie, NY
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

reply to Linklist
Most people can at least get some 3G cell service now where they live. If you live somewhere that you just can't get anything , then why the hell did you move out there?

The people I know who aren't all over the internet and were born into situations where it just wasn't something they could get easily don't really care if they have it or not. So the whole "dial up" comparison is just as out dated as bringing it up each time someone mentions sat internet.

The majority of the country will end up getting internet thanks to LTE type networks anyway. Far cheaper than last mile fiber and much faster than the horrible latency of sat.



cork1958
Cork
Premium
join:2000-02-26

said by clarknova156:

Most people can at least get some 3G cell service now where they live. If you live somewhere that you just can't get anything , then why the hell did you move out there?

The people I know who aren't all over the internet and were born into situations where it just wasn't something they could get easily don't really care if they have it or not. So the whole "dial up" comparison is just as out dated as bringing it up each time someone mentions sat internet.

The majority of the country will end up getting internet thanks to LTE type networks anyway. Far cheaper than last mile fiber and much faster than the horrible latency of sat.

"So the whole "dial up" comparison is just as out dated as bringing it up each time someone mentions sat internet."

I know someone on here who keeps saying basically the exact same thing about cable when complaining about cable (Charter in particular) and their stupid current practices. He's always trying to tell people to leave. As if everyone in the country has multiple options for anything faster than dial up.

For some people, this could be the best thing in the world, especially if it's not as ridiculously priced as Hughes or Wildblue crap!
--
The Firefox alternative.
»www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/


InTheJungle

@comcast.net

reply to not
You people are spoiled. This would be a god send for those of us who spend time in the middle of the "jungle" and can only UPLINK data fast. The up speed, better the 300baud would be great.



ctceo
Premium
join:2001-04-26
South Bend, IN

reply to not
You haven't used any modern equipment have you?


Wednesday, 19-Jun 04:12:56 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics