 mmay149qPremium
join:2009-03-05
Dallas, TX
kudos:48
1 edit | They aren't competiting on price They are just lowering the cost so that more people will accept per 50GB overages. I mean seriously would you pay $300 a month for a service with a 300GB cap and $10 per 50GB overages? I wouldn't I mean it's already horrible that for that cap you're paying almost $1 per GB anyway, gah when will people wake up and realize how screwed they're getting?!
Edit: Before people start saying "You pay that price because of the speed, not the cap!" You're paying for both.... 50 cents per GB, and 50 cents per Mbps, what a sad sad world, personally I don't even considering it paying for the speed when a cap is involved, because if you have to pay for overages, the best bang for your buck is when you get a larger cap for higher prices, not faster speed, people get this for their wireless smart phones, but not landline?!
Matt
--
Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning. -Albert Einstein |
