republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
2212
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


TriForce

join:2008-05-27
Chico, CA

Good deal for 300

300/75 for $20 more is a great deal when it's three times the amount, which is 200/50 more for just $20.

ITALIAN926

join:2003-08-16
kudos:1

Good deal for who? They would love for everyone to jump on that tier, its free money, and especially when 99% of households NEVER, surpass more than like 30Mbps at one time.



Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Longport, NJ
kudos:5

said by ITALIAN926:

Good deal for who? They would love for everyone to jump on that tier, its free money, and especially when 99% of households NEVER, surpass more than like 30Mbps at one time.

The sweet spot is the Performance tier at 25/5 for $49 and is more than enough for most households. Note I said MOST and not ALL households.

--
»www.mittromney.com/s/repeal-and-···bamacare
»www.mittromney.com/issues/health-care


danclan

join:2005-11-01
Midlothian, VA

reply to ITALIAN926

Good deal for who? They would love for everyone to jump on that tier, its free money, and especially when 99% of households NEVER, surpass more than like 30Mbps at one time.

You sure about that? In my household we consistently exceed 30mbps with VOD services, gaming and other multimedia....have a few kids and see how that works out for you.

I would say that the average household uses more bandwidth when its freely available and they dont crush each other than many people suspect. Want to watch in HD...no problem, jr wants to pull that massive game patch while you are trying to watch a flick again NO PROBLEM.... you arent going to tick off mom or dad cause there is ample headroom and vice versa

My real issue will be can they deliver that top end speed to all those that sign up for it without negative impacts to their infrastructure...

osravens

join:2011-01-26
Cumberland, MD

1 edit

reply to Linklist
There's little incentive to pay more for speed that you can't use, but 300/75 for $119 is definitely a solid price for that speed, if you should want it when compared to 100/25 for $99.

And I'm assuming these prices are less in Double/Triple Plays for customers getting TV and/or phone service.



jmn1207
Premium
join:2000-07-19
Ashburn, VA
kudos:1

I see 100/25 for $99.


osravens

join:2011-01-26
Cumberland, MD

I was thinking what the Extreme tier currently is.



jmn1207
Premium
join:2000-07-19
Ashburn, VA
kudos:1

reply to danclan

said by danclan:

My real issue will be can they deliver that top end speed to all those that sign up for it without negative impacts to their infrastructure...

That's what the caps are for, to protect the infrastructure.


09129800

join:2012-06-27
New York, NY

reply to ITALIAN926
I get it now. He works for AT&T.

When he was trolling Google Fiber I thought he was a cable company shill. But nope, cable companies can handle 300 Mbps with DOCSIS 3.0.

This guy must be employed by AT&T U-verse, because they cannot expand their speeds much farther than 30 Mbps. It would make sense to be constantly damage controlling fast Internet speeds whether it's fiber optics or DOCSIS 3.0 cable because he has to help keep a dead-end product like U-verse alive.



jmn1207
Premium
join:2000-07-19
Ashburn, VA
kudos:1

reply to osravens
Still, the 300/75 tier is 200% better at only a 20% price increase.



TriForce

join:2008-05-27
Chico, CA
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to ITALIAN926

said by ITALIAN926:

Good deal for who? They would love for everyone to jump on that tier, its free money, and especially when 99% of households NEVER, surpass more than like 30Mbps at one time.

I would like to know where you got 99% of households only using up to 30Mbps at any one time. I see the rise of cloud services making super fast broadband a necessity. Look at why Google is trying to deliver 1Gbps to households. Online services have been on the increase year over year.

ITALIAN926

join:2003-08-16
kudos:1

Keyword : "rise" , Im talking NOW.


ITALIAN926

join:2003-08-16
kudos:1

reply to 09129800
Wrong.

You must write chinese fortunes or horoscopes.



TriForce

join:2008-05-27
Chico, CA

reply to ITALIAN926
So you're the wait 'till I need it kind of person. That's fine, some of us like to live in the fast lane.



09129800

join:2012-06-27
New York, NY

reply to ITALIAN926
I don't know what your deal is, but it's clear that you work in some industry that would benefit from everyone having mediocre Internet connections.



09129800

join:2012-06-27
New York, NY

reply to TriForce
Not if it's capped like all of Comcap's other Internet plans.

I'll take Verizon's UNCAPPED FiOS offerings over Comcap any day! This new connection has the potential to rack up $20,000 in "overage fees" in just one month under Comcap's new 300 GB cap/$10 per 50 GB Internet overcharging scam.



forealze

@wideopenwest.com

reply to TriForce

said by TriForce:

300/75 for $20 more is a great deal when it's three times the amount, which is 200/50 more for just $20.

I would rather have that 200/50 for 20$


bohratom
Jersey Shore will rise again

join:2011-07-07
Red Bank NJ

reply to jmn1207
It's also a good deal for FIOS customers as their 300/65mb service is currently priced at $205. In areas that overlap with comcast I would expect that price to drop almost 50%.


ssavoy
Premium
join:2007-08-16
Dallas, PA

reply to jmn1207
Proof that the major costs are incurred in the physical network, not bandwidth.



danclan

join:2005-11-01
Midlothian, VA

reply to 09129800
meh...nm

but comcast has a 300gb soft cap now...with warnings and additional 50GB for i think 20$


Tuesday, 21-May 11:34:53 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics