republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Cobra11M

join:2010-12-23

reply to OSUGoose

Re: Hey

said by OSUGoose:

Not to defend AT&T here, but the optomist in me thinks that maybe AT&T is trying to develop a plan to deal with their rual subs (that does not mean selling them off). They may be trying to get the metro areas upgraded 100% to u-verse system, and taking the old stuff out to the rual areas. And such dident want to be restricted to a timeline of doing this.

I know the odds of that being true are very razor slim, but shoot I can dream.

to put fiber in rural areas (which is needed for u-verse) is not something that AT&T would do at all.. they answer to the stock holders and if they did their stocks would fall.. AT&T wouldn't even consider this as a option for profitability.. their serious about selling or just letting it rot. Its nice to dream but that's a fantasy that will never be fulfilled unless of course if fiber becomes almost as cheap as phone lines haha


OSUGoose

join:2007-12-27
Columbus, OH

I never said AT&T would deploy fiber for u-verse in rual areas.

I stated that perhaps the ADSL equiptment they are decomissioning in u-verse metro areas, would then get moved to the rual areas for DSL service.


Saturday, 25-May 12:31:27 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics