openbox9Premium
join:2004-01-26
japan
kudos:2 | reply to pnh102
Re: Duh said by pnh102:It has no problem getting providers to agree to even the most draconian of terms in exchange for allowing said provider to offer the iPhone. Did you miss out on some of the silliness that AT&T forced on the Apple customers during the first three years of exclusivity? While Apple may be able to extract big chunks of money out of the carriers for its "must have devices", it doesn't have the carriers by the throats.said by pnh102:I'm sure Google would *love* for AT&T to allow for them to say "hey if you use voice chat with the iPhone you gotta pay more but if you do it with any Android device, you don't." Just wait  |
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD | said by openbox9:Did you miss out on some of the silliness that AT&T forced on the Apple customers during the first three years of exclusivity? While Apple may be able to extract big chunks of money out of the carriers for its "must have devices", it doesn't have the carriers by the throats. I do remember, you could do things with the original iPhone on foreign cellular providers that you couldn't do with AT&T, but these were due mainly to AT&T's network sucking at the time. Also don't forget that Verizon balked at offering the iPhone initially because of these requirements.
--
Romney 2012 - Put an adult in charge. |
|
