 rudnickePremium join:2004-10-23 Rantoul, IL kudos:3 | Cell Phone Booster I need to boost the signal in a dealership building. 36000 sq ft.
Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks. -- One Big Ass Mistake America |
|
|
|
 GbcueP.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 | Get a repeater. |
|
 Reviews:
·Millenicom
·AT&T Southeast
·Verizon Wireless..
| reply to rudnicke Wilson Electronics »www.wilsonelectronics.com/
AG Pro Installer (801285) »www.wilsonelectronics.com/Produc···egory=11
4G LTE 700 (801865) »www.wilsonelectronics.com/Produc···egory=11
Cellular Solutions »www.cellularsolutionslargefacili···tal.html
Powerful Signal »powerfulsignal.com/commercial-ce···ers.aspx
Examples of equipment and companies that may be able to help you accomplish your goal. |
|
 harald join:2010-10-22 Columbus, OH kudos:1 | reply to rudnicke Not allowed. Only the cell phone company can do this. It is a violation of FCC regulations, and when the cell phone folks catch you you will be cited by the FCC. |
|
 KenPremium,MVM join:2003-06-16 Markle, IN | said by harald:Not allowed. Only the cell phone company can do this. It is a violation of FCC regulations, and when the cell phone folks catch you you will be cited by the FCC. I can only assume you don't understand what a repeater is, because they are extremely common and installed in thousands of buildings in the US. |
|
 moes join:2009-11-15 Indianapolis, IN | reply to harald False, had them in place in this building for the last 5 years, FCC does not care. Cell companies do not care, they are just repeaters. |
|
 harald join:2010-10-22 Columbus, OH kudos:1 | reply to Ken Don't assume - it makes an ass out of you and me.
The reg is 90.219. The FCC has proposed changing it to allow users to install boosters, in proposed rule making from April 11, 2011. As far as I can see it has not been implemented. |
|
 KenPremium,MVM join:2003-06-16 Markle, IN | Which part of 90.219 is it that you think doesn't allow cell phone repeaters? |
|
 harald join:2010-10-22 Columbus, OH kudos:1 | The first line:
"Licensees authorized to operate radio systems in the frequency bands above 150 MHz may employ signal boosters at fixed locations in accordance with the following criteria: "
A user is not a licensee. I did not say that boosters/repeaters were not allowed rather that they are only allowed to be installed by the licensee, Verizon, for example.
Here is the proposed change to allow them
»hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/i···t=305599
If you feel that they are allowed, what is the appropriate FCC regulation that allows their installation and use by individuals? |
|
 KenPremium,MVM join:2003-06-16 Markle, IN | So you believe that thousands of companies in the US, including most large hospitals, casino's, and even large government buildings are all in violation of the FCC? |
|
 harald join:2010-10-22 Columbus, OH kudos:1 | I don't have an opinion about that. Any device that transmits rf energy has to be licensed or exempted. Our routers are exempted under subpart 15, and citizen's radio under subpart 95, for example.
If these installations exist, where is the license or exemption? The only route I know of is if they are installed by the cell phone company or under their authority. |
|
 swintecPremium,VIP join:2003-12-19 Alfred, ME kudos:4 | reply to rudnicke I have done business with these folks and they are great. »3gstore.com/ |
|
 John GaltForward, MarchPremium join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp kudos:5 | reply to rudnicke The FCC is rather ambivalent about the issue at this point. They are 'studying' it, but have yet to issue a definitive ruling.
The problem is that they are installed by people who have no understanding of the issues involved, and subsequently end up causing problems for the cell industry. |
|