| reply to Desdinova
Re: $35.00 Charge to contest notice unconstitutional! Are you sure that is correct? I thought the burden of proof is just different / lower in civil cases.
I don't think you are guilty until proven innocent. We have a few lawyers on this site, I'm sure they can elaborate. |
|
|
|
| Don't think it's any kind of legal process. I suppose Comcast has to follow it's own rules (that it can change any time) and franchise agreements (which are a joke), but it's Comcast's network and it doesn't need a reason to kick you off. |
|
| reply to DataRiker
said by DataRiker:Are you sure that is correct? I thought the burden of proof is just different/lower in civil cases.
I don't think you are guilty until proven innocent. We have a few lawyers on this site, I'm sure they can elaborate. Although I am not a lawyer, but I believe that the proper term for civil cases is "preponderance of evidence". In plain English, whatever side makes stronger case for themselves wins.
--
Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies...
A MESSAGE to the RIAA and the MPAA: You shouldn't wound what you can't kill... |
|
