site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:9
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to Linklist

Re: You own the link; you pay the fine

said by Linklist:

In CIVIL cases and in copyright law, it is NOT necessary to determine which person has used the IP addr to download copyrighted material. Only a preponderance of the evidence is needed, and the presumption is that the lessee of the internet connection is guilty unless THEY can prove otherwise.

"Guilt" isn't even a consideration in civil cases, only responsibility for a tort.

The problem with the "mass subpoenas" sought by the MAFIAAs is that they don't intend to prove a tort, only to extort a settlement.

Would be interesting to consider the implications of a 'botted computer. Not a totally rare event. Is the owner of a hijacked automobile responsible for a tort if the hijacker causes property damage or bodily harm as a result of the hijacking? A 'botted computer is the analog to the 'jacked automobile.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum

Tuesday, 21-May 17:48:33 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics