 ProtusMoseImmortal. Eternal.Premium join:2001-10-03 Bellevue, NE kudos:4 | Harvesting and cataloging bounces A couple of times a year, I have occasion to send out a bulk e-mail to all our clients. Naturally, a certain percentage bounce. I need to find a way to extract the bounced messages, and isolate the destination addresses from them so I can cross-reference them with our database to know who's bouncing. Obviously, I'd like to get this as automated as possible without manually opening, copying, and pasting individual e-mail addresses hundreds of times.
Is there an easy way to take a batch of e-mails from Outlook and extract any e-mail addresses contained in the body? (the header would work also, but would increase the number of instances to search.) The ideal end result would be a txt/csv/etc containing just the e-mail address strings. -- Blogsaus "Everyone bows to something. Everyone answers to someone. Wherever your treasure lies, there your heart will be also.
Who do you belong to? " - Andrew Schwab |
|
 ProtusMoseImmortal. Eternal.Premium join:2001-10-03 Bellevue, NE kudos:4 | Disregard. I found a way to isolate them. I exported from the DB a list of just the account#s and e-mail addresses, highlighted the bounces File |Saved the whole thing as a text document, pasted that into a different excel sheet then checked to see if it existed in the bounce list and pulled the account number out in a different column. Now I just have to figure out how to change
234
267
246
into
234 267 246 -- Blogsaus "Everyone bows to something. Everyone answers to someone. Wherever your treasure lies, there your heart will be also.
Who do you belong to? " - Andrew Schwab |
|
 PaulgDisplaced YooperPremium join:2004-03-15 Neenah, WI kudos:1 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| »chandoo.org/wp/2010/01/26/delete···s-excel/
found this a year ago and saved it in 4 places  |
|
|
|
 ProtusMoseImmortal. Eternal.Premium join:2001-10-03 Bellevue, NE kudos:4 | That main method didn't work (It never actually selected the cells) but the Find and replace method in the comments did. Bookmarked. Thanks! |
|