Oh, it's definitely here.
$ dig www.facebook.com any
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.facebook.com. 110 IN A 66.220.149.88
www.facebook.com. 70 IN AAAA 2a03:2880:10:1f02:face:b00c::25"face:b00c" : cute

$ dig www.l.google.com any
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.l.google.com. 123 IN A 74.125.131.105
www.l.google.com. 123 IN A 74.125.131.99
www.l.google.com. 123 IN A 74.125.131.103
www.l.google.com. 123 IN A 74.125.131.147
www.l.google.com. 123 IN A 74.125.131.104
www.l.google.com. 123 IN A 74.125.131.106
www.l.google.com. 287 IN AAAA 2607:f8b0:4002:801::1013$ ping imap.gmail.com
PING gmail-imap.l.google.com (173.194.68.108): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 173.194.68.108: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=23.169 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.68.108: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=24.446 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.68.108: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=24.957 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.68.108: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=23.990 ms
^C
--- gmail-imap.l.google.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 23.169/24.140/24.957/0.657 ms
And now, for the total maximization of IP-envy:
$ ping6 imap.gmail.comPING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:48XX:XXX:XX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX --> 2001:4860:800a::6d
16 bytes from 2001:4860:800a::6d, icmp_seq=0 hlim=51 time=31.569 ms
16 bytes from 2001:4860:800a::6d, icmp_seq=1 hlim=51 time=29.613 ms
16 bytes from 2001:4860:800a::6d, icmp_seq=2 hlim=51 time=30.060 ms
16 bytes from 2001:4860:800a::6d, icmp_seq=3 hlim=51 time=33.781 ms
^C
--- gmail-imap.l.google.com ping6 statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 29.613/31.256/33.781/1.628 ms
And yeah, bitches, that ain't no stinkin' tunnel, it's HERE for
ME, ya'all listen: me me me me me me meeeeeee!