site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

zod5000

join:2003-10-21
Victoria, BC
Reviews:
·Shaw

reply to cableties

Re: A Gigabit is not a Gigabyte...

It is a shame they decided to use both forms of measurement.

In the early 90s it seemed everything was advertised in bytes. Then when networking took off they decided to measure in bits. Probably because they didn't want to advertise they ran at 12.5 megabytes's. 100 mbits sounds cooler.. ugh.


GlennAllen
Sunny with highs in the 80s

join:2002-11-17
Richmond, VA

Communication speeds have always been measured in bits per second. (Transfer rates on the other hand...)


sandman_1

join:2011-04-23
11111

I thought they used "baud" back in the day.



GlennAllen
Sunny with highs in the 80s

join:2002-11-17
Richmond, VA

Baud was not the same thing. There is some relevance there, but it's not the same.


sandman_1

join:2011-04-23
11111

In some cases, baud was a 1:1 ratio with bps. However baud can represent several bps. They did at one time use it to measure speed of communications.



printscreen

join:2003-11-01
Juana Diaz, PR
Reviews:
·Choice Cable TV

reply to sandman_1
Back in the day when 110 and 300 bps modems were the norm they did use "baud" but when 1200 bps modems became the norm manufacturers started using "bps" because they were still technically 300 baud modems but carried 4 bits per baud or something like that. "Baud" referred to the time division thing while bps was/is more accurate when referring to data transfer rate.


Saturday, 25-May 00:02:19 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics