site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
421
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·ALL ·Review Your VoIP Provider ·VoIP Providers ·VoIP FAQ ·Porting Rules ·What Codec?
AuthorAll Replies


crazyk4952
Premium
join:2002-02-04
united state
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Charter
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·voip.ms

delay in audio

I am prefacing this post with the following comment:

I am not trying to start a voip holy war here. I am merely posting my experience and am soliciting feedback from the community. I am NOT trying to bash on any voip providers here....

I use voip.ms as my primary voip provider. However, I have funded accounts with Callcentric and Anveo that I use for testing purposes.

I thought that I would test the delay with each provider by doing the following:

-Place a call to my cell phone from my Gigaset IP phone
-Mute the microphone on my cell phone
-Speak into the receiver of my IP phone and informally measure the delay until my voice reached my cell phone

I am on the west coast and I am registered to the losangeles server for voip.ms.

It seemed to me that the delay for both voip.ms and callcentric was about the same, at less that 0.5 seconds. This was surprising to me since the Callcentric server is in New York.

However, with Anveo, the delay was over 1 second. This surprised me as well since I thought there server was somewhere in the middle of the US!

I am not sure why I got the above results, but I guess physical proximity to the server does not necessarily mean much!


Trev
IP Telephony Addict
Premium
join:2009-06-29
Victoria, BC
kudos:4

I hear Anveo has been expanding quite rapidly these days. Perhaps using their new in-orbit gateway wasn't your best choice, however. Extra-terrestrial latency is a killer!
--
Wondering what I do? Find out at »www.digitalcon.ca


gweidenh

join:2002-05-18
Houston, TX
kudos:1

reply to crazyk4952
What are your ping times to the various sip servers?

When you do a tracert to the same servers, how many hops do they go through? Is one provider noticeably "closer"? ie, less hops?

When you do a tracert to the same servers, do they route differently? ie, does one stay on your ISP's private network longer than the others?

There are many variables to network latency.



crazyk4952
Premium
join:2002-02-04
united state
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Charter
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·voip.ms

said by gweidenh:

What are your ping times to the various sip servers?

When you do a tracert to the same servers, how many hops do they go through? Is one provider noticeably "closer"? ie, less hops?

When you do a tracert to the same servers, do they route differently? ie, does one stay on your ISP's private network longer than the others?

There are many variables to network latency.

ping (average of about 10 pings each)
losangeles.voip.ms = 32.4ms
sip.anveo.com = 86.5ms
ping.callcentric.com = 95.5 ms

traceroute
losangeles.voip.ms: 15 hops
sip.anveo.com: > 18 hops
(times out after 72.249.128.110 (72.249.128.110))
ping.callcentric.com: > 18 hops
(times out after gi2-4.core1.nyc1.starlan.com (69.60.129.221))

The visible parts of the routes do not change when multiple traceroutes are done.

gweidenh

join:2002-05-18
Houston, TX
kudos:1

said by crazyk4952:

traceroute
sip.anveo.com: > 18 hops
(times out after 72.249.128.110 (72.249.128.110))

Interesting that it times out... when I do a tracert I get:

  1     1 ms     4 ms     1 ms  
  2     9 ms    20 ms     8 ms  
  3     8 ms    13 ms    13 ms  
  4     8 ms    13 ms     9 ms  
  5    14 ms    14 ms    14 ms  pos-3-7-0-0-cr01.dallas.tx.ibone.comcast.net [68
.86.90.29]
  6    14 ms    15 ms    14 ms  xe-10-3-0.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.71.198.37]
  7    17 ms    16 ms    21 ms  COLO4-DALLA.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net [8.9.232.74
]
  8    14 ms    14 ms    14 ms  72.249.128.110
  9    15 ms    16 ms    21 ms  69.prd1.tms.anveo.com [72.9.149.69]
 

I dont know if its related, but I do find it concerning that the tracert times out before it completes to the anveo datacenter.


crazyk4952
Premium
join:2002-02-04
united state
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Charter
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·voip.ms

I have removed the first few lines in traceroute, but I don't know why mine times out!

traceroute sip.anveo.com

 7  bbr01snjsca-tge-0-2-0-6.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.2.252)  26.062 ms  26.035 ms  26.014 ms
 8  prr01snjsca-tge-1-4.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.3.61)  23.292 ms  24.040 ms  24.323 ms
 9  sjoeosr03-gex3-1.pac.sta.suddenlink.net (66.76.175.129)  22.952 ms  24.676 ms  23.347 ms
10  * sjoeosr01-10gex1-3.pac.sta.suddenlink.net (66.76.175.33)  24.869 ms  22.958 ms
11  173-219-251-43-link.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.251.43)  84.930 ms  85.689 ms  85.834 ms
12  173-219-243-37-link.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.243.37)  84.434 ms  81.899 ms  85.622 ms
13  173-219-243-24-link.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.243.24)  87.424 ms  87.401 ms  87.510 ms
14  173-219-243-34-link.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.243.34)  85.845 ms  85.568 ms  85.383 ms
15  173-219-254-171-link.tex.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.254.171)  81.621 ms  91.392 ms  91.553 ms
16  173-219-246-93-link.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.246.93)  90.610 ms  90.571 ms  90.585 ms
17  jbdr1.0.dal.colo4.com (206.123.64.41)  89.234 ms  88.943 ms  87.900 ms
18  72.249.128.110 (72.249.128.110)  90.277 ms  90.211 ms *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *
 

traceroute ping.callcentric.com
 7  bbr01snjsca-tge-0-2-0-6.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.2.252)  37.234 ms  37.148 ms  37.144 ms
 8  prr01snjsca-tge-1-2.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.3.35)  28.977 ms  28.700 ms  28.875 ms
 9  xe-5-0-6.ar2.sjc1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.153.221)  36.715 ms  36.673 ms  36.678 ms
10  ae0-80g.cr1.sjc1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.143.117)  36.501 ms *  50.651 ms
11  xe-1-2-1.cr1.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.142.138)  95.883 ms  96.868 ms  96.503 ms
12  ae1-70g.ar2.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.94.118)  91.791 ms  98.056 ms  98.618 ms
13  as8001.xe-3-0-6.ar2.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.95.130)  96.666 ms  97.120 ms  96.312 ms
14  0.e1-2.tbr1.tl9.nac.net (209.123.10.130)  97.141 ms  97.123 ms  96.910 ms
15  0.po-4.esd1.tl9.nac.net (209.123.10.65)  96.708 ms  96.759 ms *
16  207.99.81.26 (207.99.81.26)  96.596 ms  96.573 ms  96.367 ms
17  gi1-1.core1.nyc3.starlan.com (69.60.129.237)  94.411 ms  90.574 ms  93.834 ms
18  gi2-4.core1.nyc1.starlan.com (69.60.129.221)  255.712 ms  255.670 ms  255.704 ms
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *
 

gweidenh

join:2002-05-18
Houston, TX
kudos:1

reply to crazyk4952
Thats concerning. After the x.x.x.110, there should only be one more hop as shown in my tracert.

The fact that it keeps going until the maximum of 30 hops means something isn't right. It could be as simple as a router blocking the ICMP packet, or it could be indicative of a more significant routing issue. Whether it has anything to do with your perceived 'lag' is unknown.

Onsip has a west coast server. Do a tracert to sip.onsip.com and let me see your results.



crazyk4952
Premium
join:2002-02-04
united state
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Charter
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·voip.ms

said by gweidenh:

Onsip has a west coast server. Do a tracert to sip.onsip.com and let me see your results.

traceroute sip.onsip.com
 
 7  bbr01snjsca-tge-0-2-0-6.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.2.252)  28.317 ms  28.952 ms  29.036 ms
 8  sjo-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.72.101)  27.378 ms  27.554 ms  27.513 ms
 9  las-bb1-link.telia.net (213.155.135.186)  37.266 ms  37.435 ms  37.522 ms
10  las-b3-link.telia.net (213.155.134.251)  37.872 ms  38.037 ms *
11  * 204.8.22.60 (204.8.22.60)  35.686 ms  31.468 ms
12  core-proxy3.new-york-1.realtime.jnctn.net (199.7.175.103)  34.562 ms !X  41.852 ms !X  40.204 ms !X
 

gweidenh

join:2002-05-18
Houston, TX
kudos:1

OK, that looks normal and has good latency.

I'm leaning towards a routing issue causing high latency with some of the other providers.



crazyk4952
Premium
join:2002-02-04
united state
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Charter
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·voip.ms

said by gweidenh:

OK, that looks normal and has good latency.

I'm leaning towards a routing issue causing high latency with some of the other providers.

OK thanks. I suppose there is nothing I can do about it. Not that big of a deal, I just thought it was a little odd.

gweidenh

join:2002-05-18
Houston, TX
kudos:1

reply to crazyk4952
for sh*ts and giggles, try sip.flowroute.com

That server is located in Las Vegas. Just trying to get an idea of where the routing issue may lie.



crazyk4952
Premium
join:2002-02-04
united state
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Charter
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·voip.ms

said by gweidenh:

for sh*ts and giggles, try sip.flowroute.com

That server is located in Las Vegas. Just trying to get an idea of where the routing issue may lie.

traceroute sip.flowroute.com
 
 7  67-148-50-33.dia.static.qwest.net (67.148.50.33)  21.782 ms  17.898 ms  21.527 ms
 8  63.146.27.70 (63.146.27.70)  22.736 ms  22.435 ms  22.727 ms
 9  0.ae3.XL4.SEA1.ALTER.NET (152.63.106.245)  31.768 ms  32.505 ms  32.710 ms
10  0.xe-11-0-0.XL4.VEG2.ALTER.NET (152.63.2.6)  49.166 ms  47.975 ms  48.777 ms
11  GigabitEthernet7-0-0.GW3.VEG2.ALTER.NET (152.63.113.173)  49.217 ms  49.123 ms  48.595 ms
12  switchcomm-gw.customer.alter.net (208.222.10.174)  53.208 ms  53.974 ms  45.556 ms
13  te4-3.las-core2-1.switchnap.com (66.209.64.145)  51.922 ms  51.806 ms  51.772 ms
14  te2-6.las-agg7s1-1.switchnap.com (66.209.64.34)  51.240 ms  51.488 ms  51.204 ms
15  flowroute.demarc1.switchnap.com (216.115.64.190)  50.094 ms  45.280 ms  49.560 ms
16  216.115.69.189 (216.115.69.189)  93.045 ms  103.432 ms  113.627 ms
17  sip-lv1.flowroute.com (216.115.69.144)  50.390 ms  50.573 ms  50.056 ms
 

Bink
Villains... knock off all that evil

join:2006-05-14
Denver, CO
kudos:4

reply to crazyk4952
By default, UNIX traceroute tends to use UDP instead of ICMP, which Windows uses, and some people block these UDP packets (and some block ICMP). You might want to try this again using –P 1, which will mimic Windows’ behavior.



crazyk4952
Premium
join:2002-02-04
united state
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Charter
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·voip.ms

said by Bink:

By default, UNIX traceroute tends to use UDP instead of ICMP, which Windows uses, and some people block these UDP packets (and some block ICMP). You might want to try this again using –P 1, which will mimic Windows’ behavior.

Oh I thought that all traceroute used ICMP! Anyway here they using the ICMP flag (-P did not work, so I used the -I flag)

sudo traceroute -I sip.anveo.com
 
 7  bbr01snjsca-tge-0-2-0-6.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.2.252)  25.956 ms  26.932 ms  27.113 ms
 8  prr01snjsca-tge-1-4.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.3.61)  23.959 ms  24.364 ms  24.348 ms
 9  sjoeosr03-gex3-1.pac.sta.suddenlink.net (66.76.175.129)  22.789 ms  24.061 ms  24.397 ms
10  sjoeosr01-10gex1-3.pac.sta.suddenlink.net (66.76.175.33)  23.584 ms  24.338 ms  24.334 ms
11  * * 173-219-251-43-link.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.251.43)  82.283 ms
12  173-219-243-37-link.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.243.37)  85.542 ms  85.556 ms  85.531 ms
13  173-219-243-24-link.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.243.24)  85.988 ms  86.851 ms  86.996 ms
14  173-219-243-34-link.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.243.34)  83.804 ms  84.691 ms  84.808 ms
15  * 173-219-254-171-link.tex.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.254.171)  81.428 ms  85.041 ms
16  173-219-246-93-link.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.246.93)  79.640 ms  86.031 ms  86.042 ms
17  jbdr1.0.dal.colo4.com (206.123.64.41)  84.216 ms  85.167 ms  85.253 ms
18  72.249.128.110 (72.249.128.110)  85.779 ms  85.780 ms  85.746 ms
19  69.prd1.tms.anveo.com (72.9.149.69)  87.092 ms  85.857 ms  81.260 ms
 

sudo traceroute -I ping.callcentric.com
 
7  bbr01snjsca-tge-0-2-0-6.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.2.252)  27.015 ms  27.938 ms  27.992 ms
 8  prr01snjsca-tge-1-2.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.3.35)  24.253 ms  24.514 ms  24.438 ms
 9  xe-5-0-6.ar2.sjc1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.153.221)  25.025 ms  25.227 ms *
10  ae0-80g.cr1.sjc1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.143.117)  22.856 ms  22.981 ms  23.956 ms
11  xe-1-2-1.cr1.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.142.138)  94.699 ms  95.596 ms  123.886 ms
12  ae1-70g.ar2.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.94.118)  123.081 ms  122.939 ms  122.825 ms
13  as8001.xe-3-0-6.ar2.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.95.130)  122.207 ms  122.120 ms  121.960 ms
14  0.e1-2.tbr1.tl9.nac.net (209.123.10.130)  121.884 ms  121.703 ms  121.583 ms
15  0.po-4.esd1.tl9.nac.net (209.123.10.65)  97.447 ms  97.371 ms  90.488 ms
16  207.99.81.26 (207.99.81.26)  98.110 ms  98.120 ms  98.087 ms
17  gi1-1.core1.nyc3.starlan.com (69.60.129.237)  97.312 ms  97.476 ms  97.679 ms
18  gi2-4.core1.nyc1.starlan.com (69.60.129.221)  97.552 ms  97.589 ms  97.614 ms
19  www.callcentric.com (204.11.192.10)  91.684 ms  98.024 ms  97.828 ms
 

sudo traceroute -I losangeles.voip.ms
 
 7  bbr01snjsca-tge-0-2-0-6.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.2.252)  26.191 ms  27.120 ms  27.201 ms
 8  prr01snjsca-tge-7-3.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.3.155)  23.872 ms  24.027 ms  24.010 ms
 9  xe-5-0-6.ar2.sjc1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.153.221)  24.889 ms  25.083 ms *
10  * * ae0-80g.cr1.sjc1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.143.117)  22.523 ms
11  xe-5-1-0.cr1.lax1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.142.126)  37.045 ms  37.379 ms  28.238 ms
12  ae1-50g.ar1.lax2.us.nlayer.net (69.31.127.130)  37.722 ms  37.746 ms  38.425 ms
13  as29761.xe-1-0-2.ar1.lax2.us.nlayer.net (69.31.121.254)  32.766 ms  33.529 ms  33.763 ms
14  lax9-r1.core01 (67.215.251.142)  33.497 ms  29.930 ms  33.695 ms
15  hosted.by.pacificrack.com (67.215.241.250)  32.792 ms  33.520 ms  33.620 ms
 

gweidenh

join:2002-05-18
Houston, TX
kudos:1

reply to crazyk4952
Awesome advise Bink!


Tuesday, 21-May 07:48:41 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics