site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Comcast HSI Forum ·Comcast TV FAQ ·iGuide Ads ·Official Comcast Reps to BBR ·Post news
AuthorAll Replies


Mike Wolf

join:2009-05-24
Beachwood, NJ
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to yhp

Re: Can no longer record anything to VCR/DVD from Comcast?

said by yhp See Profile

First of all, home taping isn't infringement. The Supreme Court said so in 1976.

Second of all, it's not up to Comcast to simply slap a no-record signal on every channel/program. They're supposed to be obeying the wishes of the content providers in this regard. In my experience, they do exactly that, and it is the odd live event which my off-the-shelf hardware refuses to record. For the most part, I'm not restricted by Comcast or the provider in any way.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act could change the entire Supreme Court ruling because of the fact that the content is coming from a digital source and is digital content.

Althought it may not be up to Comcast to put a no-record signal on every channel, as you put it, if the content providers want that, then it wouldn't be Comcast's fault.

yhp

join:2006-12-27
Philadelphia, PA

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act could change the entire Supreme Court ruling because of the fact that the content is coming from a digital source and is digital content.

What the DMCA did (among other things) is make any anti-copying mechanism sacrosanct: if you circumvent it, or distribute the tools to do it, you're breaking the law.

It's different and separate from infringement. One can distribute circumvention tools (at great legal risk, of course) without infringing copyright.

Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

said by yhp:

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act could change the entire Supreme Court ruling because of the fact that the content is coming from a digital source and is digital content.

What the DMCA did (among other things) is make any anti-copying mechanism sacrosanct: if you circumvent it, or distribute the tools to do it, you're breaking the law.

It's different and separate from infringement. One can distribute circumvention tools (at great legal risk, of course) without infringing copyright.

Which is why for awhile I do not know if it is true any more but VLC used to warn people about mirroring libdcss(I think thats the file) on US servers. Because VLC has no Macrovision license it technically violates the DMCA if used for watching DVDs.

Of course I will state there are Zero moral issues in using VLC even if its ability to decode DVDs violates the DMCA.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports

yhp

join:2006-12-27
Philadelphia, PA

Of course I will state there are Zero moral issues in using VLC even if its ability to decode DVDs violates the DMCA.

DVD Decrypter was (IMHO) the most user-friendly DVD ripper, and it still works on most DVDs (not BDs), but obviously, as the world's most easy-to-use DECSS breaker it was pretty much the first tool to be targeted for disappearance, thanks to the DMCA. I still use version 3.5.4.0.

Sunday, 19-May 21:59:20 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics