site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·TekSavvy DSL Reviews ·TekSavvy Forum FAQ ·Speedtest results
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies

swiftex

join:2008-05-10
Toronto, ON
kudos:1

reply to HiVolt

Re: [DSL] Upgraded to 25/7, experiencing congestion

Amazing how Bell sends a modem with the same firmware it's supposed to replace knowing that firmware doesn't work, Doh!

crazypants

join:2011-02-25
North York, ON

reply to HiVolt
Agreed



HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17

reply to crazypants
No, the proper firmware did not solve the download issue. There's still congestion, and Its probably just the remote is reached capacity.

But at least I want the proper friggin firmware for my modem so i can get the upload speed I pay for.


crazypants

join:2011-02-25
North York, ON
Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL

reply to HiVolt
But, your results for u/l are not good, do we keep on sending them back till one works well? Actually, I could accept lower upload if I had solid download speeds.

Still doesn't solve the slow speed issue, unless you really think it is a firmware thing.



HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17
Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL

reply to crazypants

said by crazypants:

Well, how do I do that? If I get another one I could end up with one that re-boots.

They said you can just send it back. I left the PPPoE login enabled in this one, hoping that it might auto-update to the rebooting firmware... just to see if the stats are any better with that one.

crazypants

join:2011-02-25
North York, ON

reply to HiVolt
Well, how do I do that? If I get another one I could end up with one that re-boots.



HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17

reply to crazypants
I bet your upload would be fine if you would just get the proper modem with the proper firmware.

The difference is huge.


crazypants

join:2011-02-25
North York, ON
Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL

reply to HiVolt
At least your u/l is better than mine.

Seriously, can you believe TSI hasn't said anything about all of this. No explanation. I still haven't heard from them in direct forum, no follow up on this thread. I have to commend you for pressing on.

TSI ended up in the same situation as cable. Over sold and waiting for upgrades.



HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17
Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL

reply to crazypants

Click for full size
Well I got a modem swap, but I got the same shitty firmware 1.0.4.3EF-ISAM, and the upload sync sucks bigtime like before...

crazypants

join:2011-02-25
North York, ON

reply to MaynardKrebs
So far all I heard are crickets from Teksavvy's side. Any updates?


MaynardKrebs
Premium
join:2009-06-17
kudos:4

reply to HiVolt

said by HiVolt:



Back to full speed. This is only a short 2-3 hour window where it tanks... The remote could be at capacity, and Bell FibeTV is given priority when people watch TV the most.

It's called under-engineering the network.


HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17

reply to HiVolt
TSI has ordered a modem swap, but it's a lottery which modem I get. We'll see. I can send back whichever modem is worse.



HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17
Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL

reply to swiftex


Back to full speed. This is only a short 2-3 hour window where it tanks... The remote could be at capacity, and Bell FibeTV is given priority when people watch TV the most.


swiftex

join:2008-05-10
Toronto, ON
kudos:1

reply to HiVolt

said by HiVolt:

Ok, that'd be great, gives me another full evening of testing!

Agreed.


HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17

reply to swiftex
Ok, that'd be great, gives me another full evening of testing!


swiftex

join:2008-05-10
Toronto, ON
kudos:1
Reviews:
·WIND Mobile
·Callcentric
·voip.ms

reply to HiVolt

said by HiVolt:

So far, yes. But this is only after a few hours of use, unfortunately I have to return it to you!

Keep it until Friday if you want, I can get by with this one for a bit.


HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17

reply to swiftex
So far, yes. But this is only after a few hours of use, unfortunately I have to return it to you!


swiftex

join:2008-05-10
Toronto, ON
kudos:1
Reviews:
·WIND Mobile
·Callcentric
·voip.ms

reply to HiVolt

said by HiVolt:

Yep. Though the sync was stable with the other modem, never disconnected. Just not syncing at full speed with it.

Is the overall experience with 1.0.4.3EF-STINGER much better and/or consistently better at your location?


HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17

reply to swiftex
Yep. Though the sync was stable with the other modem, never disconnected. Just not syncing at full speed with it.


swiftex

join:2008-05-10
Toronto, ON
kudos:1
Reviews:
·WIND Mobile
·Callcentric
·voip.ms

reply to HiVolt

said by HiVolt:

Well, but just even look at the noise margin on the upstream on the two firmwares

5.6dB vs 12db.

That should be telling enough.

That's why you get different cap stats reported.

Saturday, 25-May 12:16:46 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics