site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Canadian Broadband FAQ ·Canadian ISP Reviews ·Canadian ISP Forums
AuthorAll Replies

jfmezei
Premium
join:2007-01-03
Pointe-Claire, QC
kudos:22

reply to InvalidError

Re: CNOC's Part 1 Filing on the 703/704 tariffs

Reading the march 8th responses. CNOC has been a bad boy and have purchased wholesale volumes of "#" from Bell for their filing....

quote:
Pursuant to section 39 of the Telecommunications Act, the network details of the three CNOC members that have elected to provide responses to the Commission’s request for information are being filed in confidence with the Commission. The information in question is of a competitively sensitive nature to the three CNOC members.

Tisk Tisk Even the names of the ISP are converted into Bell Canada's proprietary "#" characters.

Their idea of small: ISP l big enough to have 2 AHSSPIs. (but they needed that to make their point).

jfmezei
Premium
join:2007-01-03
Pointe-Claire, QC
kudos:22

Is this the ISP I can't name or Acanac/Distributel ?

quote:
Large Independent ISP
A) The company uses the services of a number of incumbents in order to provide service to its end users. For the purpose of responding to this question, the company is focusing on those incumbents that have adopted the capacity method approved in TRP 2011-703.

Bell Canada: The company interconnects with Bell Canada through 23 1 Gbps AHHSPIs mapped to EAS links according to a 1 to 1 relationship. This arrangement provides the company access to end users encompassed by Bell Aliant’s/Bell Canada’s entire footprint in Ontario and Quebec.

Rogers: The company interconnects to Rogers using 4 10 Gbps links that are mapped into 37 VLANs that connect to a total of 19 POIs. This arrangement provides the company access to end users encompassed by these Rogers POIs.

Cogeco: The company has 1 Gbps # link to one POI in Cogeco’s serving territory. This arrangement provides the company access to end users encompassed by the Cogeco area served by that single POI.

Videotron: The company has 1 Gbps connection to Videotron’s main aggregation POI in Montreal. This arrangement provides the company access to end users encompassed by Videotron’s entire footprint.


InvalidError

join:2008-02-03
kudos:5

said by jfmezei:

Is this the ISP I can't name or Acanac/Distributel ?

AFAIK, TSI is the only ISP with anywhere near 23 AHSSPIs for Bell GAS.

jfmezei
Premium
join:2007-01-03
Pointe-Claire, QC
kudos:22

reply to jfmezei
Cogeco says it uses ECMP (Equal Cost MultiPath) to distribute upstream traffic amongst the number of links that exist to the ISP and that this provides load balancing as well as automated failover.

Can anyone comment on ECMP ? Wikipedia does not have nice things to say about it.

Anything preventing ISPs from using the same for the downstrieam traffic (from ISP to the cableco) ?

Also, assuming that the lan extensions between the caleco and the ISP are terminated by switches, with ECMP, how would a router know that one of 4 links has gone down ?


InvalidError

join:2008-02-03
kudos:5

said by jfmezei:

Can anyone comment on ECMP ? Wikipedia does not have nice things to say about it.

Cost-based routing is an IP-routing concept where each possible route has a cost associated with it and routers choose paths based on lowest cost. By setting multiple paths to same cost, the router simply picks one for each packet and calls it a day. This is essentially is an IP equivalent of LAGs on Ethernet. The traffic distribution likely uses header hashes like LAG does so each src:dest pair always uses the same path to avoid out-of-order transmissions.

Since this is an IP-based solution, it can only work with TPIA.

said by jfmezei:

Anything preventing ISPs from using the same for the downstrieam traffic (from ISP to the cableco) ?

If the cableco makes it work one way, there is no reason for it not to work the other way with the same cableco.

For cablecos that hand out connections over MPLS, VLANs or other traffic segregation method, you are out of luck. Cogeco's ECMP can only work for plain-IP interconnect.

said by jfmezei:

Also, assuming that the lan extensions between the caleco and the ISP are terminated by switches, with ECMP, how would a router know that one of 4 links has gone down ?

In all likelyhood, the switch would advertise route-down, the router would pick that up, look up which routes are affected, drop them and (optionally) start looking for alternate routes.

As for why a "switch" would advertise that a route is down, there is no such thing as a switch-only "switch" in the carrier market, most have a fully functional IP routing core feature set.

Davesnothere
No-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages

join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6

reply to InvalidError

said by InvalidError:

said by jfmezei:

Is this the ISP I can't name or Acanac/Distributel ?

AFAIK, TSI is the only ISP with anywhere near 23 AHSSPIs for Bell GAS.

 
IIRC, there seems to always have been a tit for tat (or neck in neck) counting of Bell AHSSPIs (around DSLR) for TSI & for Acanac (which would now include those of D-Tel too).

So wouldn't the more likely identifier be the single Cogeco POI ? (thinking Chatham), as doesn't Distributel already service from more than one Cogeco POI ?

--

We have only 2 things about which to worry :
(1) That things may never get back to normal
(2) That they already HAVE !
-
START Forum »Start Communications
Or you can still use Canadian Broadband.


resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7

Anyone able to post incumbent replies from yesterday?



elwoodblues
Elwood Blues
Premium
join:2006-08-30
HarperLand

I just checked the file, the last document posted was from CNOC on the 21st.


jfmezei
Premium
join:2007-01-03
Pointe-Claire, QC
kudos:22

The incumbent replies from yesterday were about tariffs on service charges (5 different processes)

Today is the deadline for the CNOC Part 1 final replies. Tey should be pouring in later today.


resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7
Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable

said by jfmezei:

The incumbent replies from yesterday were about tariffs on service charges (5 different processes)

Today is the deadline for the CNOC Part 1 final replies. Tey should be pouring in later today.

Anything interesting in the replies? Nothing's up on the CRTC site.

jfmezei
Premium
join:2007-01-03
Pointe-Claire, QC
kudos:22

I'll try to post the replies. I really have not had the time to read any of them. and today I have to do the replit to Shaw's R&V. There are deadlines every day for some time now, with some days having multiple deadlines.


jfmezei
Premium
join:2007-01-03
Pointe-Claire, QC
kudos:22

Here are the march 28 final replies on the CNOC Part 1

jfmezei
Premium
join:2007-01-03
Pointe-Claire, QC
kudos:22

CNOC Reply 2···inal.pdf
CNOC Comments
primus.pdf
Primus' submission
MTS Allstream.pdf
Primus' submission
CRTC-CNOC-Pa···tion.pdf
vaxination Informatique's submission
More submissions

freejazz_RdJ

join:2009-03-10
kudos:1

Top two highlights for me:
-The current model with CBB for residential and flat rate for business has created a quagmire.
-Two parties quoting an exchange between KvF and Mr. Rocca, but extracting different meanings from it.


Saturday, 25-May 19:39:53 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics