 Reviews:
·CableOne
·magicjack.com
·AT&T Southeast
·HughesNet Satell..
| 250 MB daily cap limit (Fraud by HughesNet?) I was questioning the method they used in tracking 250 MB download cap, today early on the cap was reached, ok, added a token, then about 9 hours later, its hit its limit again. I am thinking, no way since no one here is streaming videos or playing games.
2 people currently on the router, me I am not on the computer but about 7-8 times a day for about 5-10 mins, few mins ago I decided to download a 1 MB program which tracks data transfer on my computer, this was about 30 mins ago, so far have not downloaded more than 2 MBs of data. So you consider rounding up to 2 megs multiplying by 48 (48 times their is 30 min increments within a 24 hour period) = 96 Megs. With 1 laptop and 1 pc running, 96 x 2 = 192.
This is 58 MBs off the 250 MB cap limit.
But this is an average over a 24 hour period, it so happens hughesnet goes unlimited between 2 and 7 am I think it is. So their is this 5 hour gap you can subtract off the 48 thirty minute increments that currently are averaging.
I am really failing to see how cap limits are reached so quickly and sounds like an attempt by hughesnet to force people into buying the $5 tokens very often.
It seems they backed off a good bit by bribing with 3 complimentary tokens upon asking where hughesnet HQ is located in order to make complaints through the BBB. |
|
 grohgregDunno. Ask The Chief join:2001-07-05 Dawson Springs, KY | 1. have you reviewed your hourly usage report? Perhaps it can lend a clue as to how much was being used when. 2. is your home network secure or public? and if secure, how many people have the password? 3. have you turn off all the auto-updates on both computers that (you know) are connected to the modem? 4. have you compared notes with the 2nd (known) person on the router as to how much was downloaded and when? 5. do you understand that downloads must start after 0200 and end before 0700? Any that are (a) started before 0200 then end after 0200 or (b) started before 0700 and end after 0700 are automatically subtracted from your daily allowance.
..greg.. -- HN7000S - 98cm Prodelin/2w "pure" Osiris - ProPlus - G16/1010H - NOC:GTN - NAT 67.142.115.130 - Gateway 66.82.25.10 - DNS 66.82.4.12 and 66.82.4.8 - Firefox 8/MSIE9 - AV/Firewalled by NIS2012 |
|
|
|
 Reviews:
·ooma
·Virgin Mobile Br..
·Charter
·HughesNet Satell..
·Millenicom
| reply to Sarentack bbbdc@hughes.net executivecustomercare@hughes.net william.smouse@hns.com
Its the BBB of Maryland (DC area)
said by Sarentack:It seems they backed off a good bit by bribing with 3 complimentary tokens upon asking where hughesnet HQ is located in order to make complaints through the BBB. |
|
 Reviews:
·CableOne
·magicjack.com
·AT&T Southeast
·HughesNet Satell..
| reply to grohgreg 1. Well on this computer since 10:30 PM last night (its 10:30 am currently) This computer has downloaded 29 MB, about 1 1/2 hour of that 29 me online browsing, the rest is keeping services like yahoo IM active and such.
2. network is secure, need the WEP key to access the connection.
3. auto updates are on on mine, but its set to not install, so I know if some was downloaded. Other laptop is up to date all the way.
4. About to today.
5. Yes, hardly anything activity between those times though, everyone is in bed.
I am just finding it very hard to see a 250 MB cap limit reached as quickly as hughesnet says. |
|
 | said by Sarentack:3. auto updates are on on mine, but its set to not install, so I know if some was downloaded. Other laptop is up to date all the way.
The only way to make sure that Windows is not downloading updates is to set the updates to inform you when updates are available and to let you manually decide what to download and when.
This week was the major Windows update for the month, and it was a pretty large one. Each of my two Windows 7 machines had over 80 MB worth of updates. If you have your computers set to auto, I'm confident that you had large update downloads on either Tuesday or Wednesday of this week. |
|
 | might of been Tuesday when i got mine.
I never started really looking into the cap limits until last night. |
|
 grohgregDunno. Ask The Chief join:2001-07-05 Dawson Springs, KY 1 edit | reply to Sarentack So I guess your answer to #1 is no. If you're unfamiliar with what I'm talking about, you have to log into your HughesNet account online to review the current and most recent 24 hour periods.
And your answer to #3 is not reassuring. Hell, a single service pack can eat up your 250MB daily allowance in a single bite. I had VISTA updates totaling nearly 100MB one day last week, and one single HP update on this Win7 machine yesterday of 152MB. If your computer is anything like most others in the world, there can be literally dozens of individual auto-updates to address on any given machine. And the advice given is sound; set them to only notify you before the fact. At that point you can pre-determine if a large update could put you into FAP status.
Again; log into your HughesNet account, and see just how much was actually downloaded, and when. Then perhaps you'll realize that you may have pulled the trigger on your fraud accusation just a tad early.
//greg// -- HN7000S - 98cm Prodelin/2w "pure" Osiris - ProPlus - G16/1010H - NOC:GTN - NAT 67.142.115.130 - Gateway 66.82.25.10 - DNS 66.82.4.12 and 66.82.4.8 - Firefox 8/MSIE9 - AV/Firewalled by NIS2012 |
|
 | Can the hughesnet site to check that really be accurate and not some inflated number? |
|
 grohgregDunno. Ask The Chief join:2001-07-05 Dawson Springs, KY | I've had a Hughes connection since before they even started tracking that kind of stuff. Haven't once had cause to take issue with their accounting in all that time. To the best of my understanding, the online usage report is compiled from data provided by your modem. If data wasn't recorded as having been processed by the modem, it doesn't go on the usage report.
That said, I did experience one otherwise unexplainable FAP. Neither I nor tech support could figure out how it happened. And a small number of customers have (rarely) reported usage accumulation when were allegedly powered down. I say allegedly, because some folks don't understand that the modem still talks to the gateway - even if the computer that's attached to it is shut down. Anyway, that opens up the possibility that the usage data within the modem may on rare occasions experience corruption (due to cable short, static electricity, power problems, et cetera) .
//greg// -- HN7000S - 98cm Prodelin/2w "pure" Osiris - ProPlus - G16/1010H - NOC:GTN - NAT 67.142.115.130 - Gateway 66.82.25.10 - DNS 66.82.4.12 and 66.82.4.8 - Firefox 8/MSIE9 - AV/Firewalled by NIS2012 |
|
 | reply to Sarentack said by Sarentack:Can the hughesnet site to check that really be accurate and not some inflated number? Hi Sarentack If you don't trust, I use the free »www.softperfect.com/products/networx/ sits in my system tray for immediate results.
»www.softperfect.com/products/networx/ |
|
 Reviews:
·CableOne
·magicjack.com
·AT&T Southeast
·HughesNet Satell..
| 
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
This is the data from the program running since 10:30 PM last night.
62 MB total download since then with a 78 MB total transfer. |
|
 | reply to Sarentack You might want to check your computers for malware. The last time I hit the FAP, one PC on the network was infected with malware and downloading 100's of MB a day. I recommend Malwarebytes Free and Superantispware Free. |
|
 | mine is at peek performance, checking other persons laptop and all though. |
|
 | Over the last few years on this board, I can recall a number of people who have complained about their bandwidth draining faster than it should.
Frequently, the cause has been some form of malware. Often, the cause has been Windows or other software update downloads that the user was not aware of. I can also recall a couple of instances where the cause was some sort of denial of service attack on a Hughes gateway.
On the other hand, I don't recall any confirmed instance of some sort of "accounting" error by Hughes denying people of the bandwidth that they deserved.
In your case, I'd guess that the culprit is the large Windows updates this week. When you check Windows update logs, you can only determine when the updates were actually installed. You cannot determine when the downloads actually took place. Even when you schedule Windows updates for a particular time, you are only scheduling the installation time for the updates. Windows will still download the updates at a time of their convenience. Again, the only way to control when Windows update downloads occur is to manually download the updates.
Also, even if you think your computer is clean, I would suggest, as did Nimblewill, that you run scans with the free versions of Malwarebytes and SuperAntiSpyware. They are each capable of finding things that other scans, including anti-virus scans won't find. For example, a couple of years ago, one of my computers had been infected with a rather insidious downloader Trojan that was constantly draining bandwidth at a rate as high as 75-80 MB per hour. A number of AV and malware scans could not find it, and only SuperAntiSpyware was able to find it. |
|
 Reviews:
·HughesNet Satell..
| reply to Sarentack Consider this....they never had tokens till about a year ago.
It is not a thing Hughesnet implemented lightly.Do they make money off them?I am sure they do,is it supposed to hurt a little when buying them?I am sure they have the Refill figured to the cent of how much it costs them to refill the bucket(Especially since there are those that will go all willy nilly with it).
Check all the things Greg has suggested (Especially the second user) then make sure Adobe is not downloading to.
Anti Virus is usually not a huge updater by the way.Although if you do it on several machines at once I could see it hitting the 250 MB a tad hard.That is why you need a bit of a backup storage flash drive for apps to share between PC's (Networks work good to for this) |
|
 Reviews:
·HughesNet Satell..
| reply to Sarentack I do not update Windows till a Service Pack rolls out. However I do not recommend this to Joe User. Its just not safe and can bite you on the rear if not careful.
You should have a option (Win XP did) to turn them off but notify you when they hit. |
|
 Reviews:
·HughesNet Satell..
| reply to Sarentack Cool that is ReadErrors Meter that I believe he never updated for Win Vista/7.He either sold it or marketed it himself or possibly had it stolen by a bigger software company.
»www.metal-machine.de/readerror/
If that is Readerrors version you are running.....It is not confirmed 100% on Vista and 7. |
|
 | Sarentack may I please have the name of the meter you use?
I remember once downloading a paid meter that looked EXACTLY as readerrors. |
|
 grohgregDunno. Ask The Chief join:2001-07-05 Dawson Springs, KY | reply to Tweakbl said by Tweakbl:Anti Virus is usually not a huge updater by the way. Unless it's something like a Norton version update that is. I got one of those a couple weeks ago. Don't remember the file size, but it was not insignificant especially since I have Norton on multiple computers.
As an example of just downloading an update once, my default download folder location is on a networked attached storage device. With that single copy, I then manually update the PCs over the home network.
//greg// -- HN7000S - 98cm Prodelin/2w "pure" Osiris - ProPlus - G16/1010H - NOC:GTN - NAT 67.142.115.130 - Gateway 66.82.25.10 - DNS 66.82.4.12 and 66.82.4.8 - Firefox 8/MSIE9 - AV/Firewalled by NIS2012 |
|
 | reply to Tweakbl Meter I use is netmeter. |
|