site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
812
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Subaru
1-3-2-4
Premium
join:2001-05-31
Greenwich, CT

THANK YOU!!

Way to go FCC!


FBGuy
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Evanston, IL

said by Subaru:

Way to go FCC Incumbent Industry!

FTFY


BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

Please. Maybe lightsqaured should have used the frequencies as intended.



FBGuy
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Evanston, IL

They told the FCC what it would be used for. Light can be used for many things. There is no specific purpose for any specific wavelength of light.


Chubbysumo

join:2009-12-01
Superior, WI
Reviews:
·Charter

reply to BF69
they were sticking within what they told the FCC it would be used for. The GPS industry has had a flawed product that goes outside of its band for quite some time, and was told to fix it ages ago, and never did. I wholeheartedly believe that lightsquared is in the right here, because they were not outside their spectrum, GPS was, and still is. Its now just a matter of courts once again, proving that the FCC has no legal teeth, and once this is over, lightsquared can proceed, and GPS makers can go take a hike to fix and replace their shoddy products. Just look at who is outside of their spectrum here.


moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD

reply to FBGuy

said by FBGuy:

They told the FCC what it would be used for. Light can be used for many things. There is no specific purpose for any specific wavelength of light.

The original intent was a satellite based only system. The "conditional" waiver was to see if the ground based system could work. It did not work as intended and the FCC pulled the plug.

And, yes, there are purposes for specific wavelengths of light and even ways you are not allowed to use certain wavelengths of light.


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Boston, MA

reply to FBGuy
Their proximity to other wavelengths of light is relevant. There's more crosstalk between neighboring frequencies. Try listening to someone quietly playing an A note on a flute from a hundred yards away while someone else plays a A# on a trombone into your ear. And I realize that sound isn't photons, but the inverse square law applies in either case.


Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

reply to Chubbysumo

said by Chubbysumo:

I wholeheartedly believe that lightsquared is in the right here, because they were not outside their spectrum, GPS was, and still is. Its now just a matter of courts once again, proving that the FCC has no legal teeth, and once this is over, lightsquared can proceed, and GPS makers can go take a hike to fix and replace their shoddy products.

The FCC may have no legal teeth but the NTIA, members of Congress and the U.S. Department of Defense do so don't expect any more than a symbolic Lightsquared victory in the courts.


Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Longport, NJ
kudos:5

said by Sammer:

The FCC may have no legal teeth but the NTIA, members of Congress and the U.S. Department of Defense do so don't expect any more than a symbolic Lightsquared victory in the courts.

And Lightsquared and Falcone will be spending all their legal funds defending themselves from SEC lawsuits and prosecutions anyway to have much money left over for lawsuits against the FCC.
--
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, I'm from the government and I'm here to help.
»www.politico.com/2012-election/



FBGuy
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Evanston, IL

reply to vpoko
I'm near deaf. That is a bad example. You can engineer a machine to tell the difference.



vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Boston, MA

Unfortunately there are a lot of ears already being used, replacing them all would be expensive and painful. Likewise with GPS. As someone in another post pointed out, why do you think TV channels aren't adjacent to each other? Interference happens.



FBGuy
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Evanston, IL

with shoddy engineering yes.



vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Boston, MA

Maybe you want to spend $5,000 on a TV or GPS unit that's better engineered; I don't. And even then you'd have interference, you can improve it with better engineering but you can never get it down to 0.

How about this: what if we allocated the spectrum in a way that took reality into account. Actually, that's been done reasonably well (as far as the bandplan, not necessarily who has licenses and such). So now let's stick to it.



FBGuy
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Evanston, IL

Yes, Lets just stick with something that doesn't work.



vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Boston, MA

GPS works just fine, and will continue to do so because companies like LightSquared won't get to use satellite bands for terrestrial transmitters. All is good in the world this morning.


Saturday, 18-May 18:59:32 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics