 kapilThe Kapil
join:2000-04-26
Chicago, IL | reply to workablob
Re: Go to Hell, Google I've never understood that line of reasoning. How many pedophiles do you think there are just wandering about. Or if the concentration really is that high in your neighborhood, might I suggest you look into relocating.
I have an open SSID on purpose. I *want* information and access to it to be free. I want my neighbors and random strangers to be able to use it. It's a deliberate choice. It's my own way of revolting against the Big Brother state where everyone and everything is locked down and tracked, controlled with threats of legal penalties, secret courts, warrant-less arrests, or violations of "acceptable use" or provider service agreements.
--
»www.kapilville.com |
|
Reviews:
 ·Comcast
| reply to kapil
Re: Go to Hell, Google said by kapil:I've never understood that line of reasoning. How many pedophiles do you think there are just wandering about. Or if the concentration really is that high in your neighborhood, might I suggest you look into relocating.
I have an open SSID on purpose. I *want* information and access to it to be free. I want my neighbors and random strangers to be able to use it. It's a deliberate choice. It's my own way of revolting against the Big Brother state where everyone and everything is locked down and tracked, controlled with threats of legal penalties, secret courts, warrant-less arrests, or violations of "acceptable use" or provider service agreements.
Seriously?
»mapsexoffenders.com/
Dave |
|
kapilThe Kapil
join:2000-04-26
Chicago, IL | We're getting off-track here but...
1. Sex offender is not the same thing as a pedophile. But someone I knew that you're the type that conflate the two.
2. This national fascination we have with castigating sex offenders for the remainder of their lives, after they've paid their debt to society is immoral, unethical and unconstitutional. Lifetime registration, mandatory disclosure, preventing or limiting where they can live and work...if that doesn't meet the 'cruel and unusual' standard, I don't know what does.
People who rape children and such are despicable human beings...but everyone deserves a shot at redemption...especially in a nation where people can't seem the shut the hell up about being "blessed" and being the "greatest nation" on Earth etc.
Also, lumping in a guy who raped a child with a guy who, at 18 years of age, got in trouble for sexing his 16 year old girlfriend defies logic and reason.
--
»www.kapilville.com |
|
Reviews:
·Comcast
| said by kapil:We're getting off-track here but...
1. Sex offender is not the same thing as a pedophile. But someone I knew that you're the type that conflate the two.
2. This national fascination we have with castigating sex offenders for the remainder of their lives, after they've paid their debt to society is immoral, unethical and unconstitutional. Lifetime registration, mandatory disclosure, preventing or limiting where they can live and work...if that doesn't meet the 'cruel and unusual' standard, I don't know what does.
People who rape children and such are despicable human beings...but everyone deserves a shot at redemption...especially in a nation where people can't seem the shut the hell up about being "blessed" and being the "greatest nation" on Earth etc.
Also, lumping in a guy who raped a child with a guy who, at 18 years of age, got in trouble for sexing his 16 year old girlfriend defies logic and reason.
Yeah, your right. But, all pedophiles are sex offenders and not all sex offenders are guys like me who had an underage girlfriend.
My point is any and all of them are more of a threat to you via your unsecured WiFi than Google ever will be.
But if you want to assume they are all just trying to get on with their lives after paying their debt it's your decision.
Dave |
|
Reviews:
·Comcast Business..
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·Clearwire Wireless
 ·AT&T Southeast
| reply to kapil
Good luck explaining why your network is open to everyone yet someone used it for illegals reasons such as hacking/spamming or worse child pornography.
Your TOS should clearly state that you are responible for anything and everything that goes through that connection. So retaliate all you want but the end result is your responsibility. |
|
| reply to kapil
Okay...so dont care who is logging onto your network. At least care about those they are misleading...after all, if they are clever enough its you who will be served up to your local prison inmates for some good ole fashioned sexual deviance. Really. Its facts. Pedophiles (forget the damn sex register) are abusing children through unsecured networks JUST LIKE YOURS. While I cant say yours for definte I can say its only a matter of time. In that regards you will be as responsibnle for that damage as the perpatrator. WORD OF LIFE.
Its more than just pedo's and sex offenders. Your also opening a gate for malicous users to hide their tracks as they hack others and steal form others.
So basically, if you cant lock it down because you think everyone should be able to do whatever they want on the net. Dont cry when they lock you down, as now you are PHYSICALLY aware of the exploits you are assisting. You can actually be charged as an accomplis now and all you did was try and share this beautiful thing called the internet.
Grow up and see that by being 'nice' you are not only endangering yourself but others as well. Isnt that worth locking your signal down ...or are their other motives that you havent disclosed here?
Im not saying EVERYONE else around you is bad news but you can bet someone around you may have less than desirable intentions.
I do agree that Google went WAY to far and in their own way helps promote the same criminal activity someone who leaves their network unsecured does. AND YES, THEY SHOULD SERVE SOME TIME FOR IT!!! |
|
