 DrStrangeTechnically feasiblePremium join:2001-07-23 West Hartford, CT kudos:1 | reply to Ender3rd
Re: [Scam] Card Services relentless phone calls revisited Some interesting info posted here. Can't attest to its veracity. If I were the Feds, I would be following up on this.
»whocallsme.com/Phone-Number.aspx···028479/3
said by anon poster: The reason a large portion of the people are having trouble with this number is because this number is being "Spoofed" by Delta Outsource Group, a collection agency located in O'Fallon, MO. They will try and gather enough information to create an account. Many bank accounts have been drained by this establishment and many "Spoofed" phone numbers have been fraudulently used to aquire information. This not only hurts people by the harrassment, but also hurts the establishment that the number belongs to.
Note: Insight Services is affiliated with Delta Outsource Group.
|
|
 | reply to Doctor Olds It's a common misconception that only/just because it's an 800 number that they can get your number from blocked caller id.
Actually, it's really any company that answers and processes calls digitally - it doesn't matter if the number is toll free, or regular toll. As long as they're using a computer system to receive calls, they get the CPN data directly. Since calls are not terminating on analog caller id displays at a landline provider, they're not obligated to honor the privacy bit.
Some people will think of magical things with ani/CPN/BTN etc. but the fact of the matter is the vast majority of these phone numbers are simply ignoring the privacy bit. All the CPN is just a call-back or "directory" number that is used to populate the caller id display of the callee's Pots or Pots-like replacement service. Once you call into a computer system, then your number is fair game. There is no obligation to honor the privacy bit at that point.
What we're probably referring to for toll free numbers is the BTN or billing number. I guess that's the ANI as some might call it. Still, that information is not passed to the callee on the fly. It's only used for billing purposes witin the PSTN, so it's really not an "unblockable caller id". However, they'll be able to view the billing number on their bills once the call is billed. |
|
 | reply to Ender3rd I ran two searches which I pasted below - enjoy!
Reverse Phone Number Lookup
Search Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Query Submitted: Phone Number = (720) 409-2532
Client Reference: Card Services
_______________________________________________________________________
Record # 1 of 1
Record From: Subscriber Information - Phones Plus
Phone: (720) 409-2532
Phone Usage: Cellular
Phone Type: Possible Cell Phone
Special Service Code: Cellular Services
Dial Indicator: 1
Carrier: NEW CINGULAR WIRLESS
Phone Region: DENVER, CO
DENVER, CO 80202-2906
_______________________________________________________________________
Reverse Phone Number Lookup
Search Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Query Submitted: Phone Number = (720) 409-2532
Client Reference: Card Services
_______________________________________________________________________
Record # 1 of 1
Record From: Telephone Company
Name: MCLEODUSA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.- CO
City/Rate Center: DENVER
State: CO
|
|
 DrStrangeTechnically feasiblePremium join:2001-07-23 West Hartford, CT kudos:1 | I get the same results [Cingular (now AT&T) Wireless], but note that McLeodUSA is a backbone provider for Pactec [who provide VOIP service]. Interesting.
Also interesting that it isn't Pacific Telecom. |
|
 | reply to Ender3rd I got a call yesterday but she hung up on me when I asked her if I could make a deposit somewhere haha |
|
 | reply to DrStrange Interesting information about the Delta Outsource Group. I haven't heard from the Card Services Scam people for over 6 weeks, but I did file a complaint with the FCC that contained specifics about their spoofing and persistent infringement at the end of April. As expected, I got a form e-mail back from them that was fairly useless. I also re-registered both of my phone numbers with the National Do Not Call Registry, even though it's supposedly not necessary, and I haven't really been bothered by anyone following the 30 day clear-out period after re-registering. Makes me wonder about the validity of the claim that you never fall off the list... -- Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. (Charlie Reese) |
|
 | If you want information on this scam and the people behind it I recommend checking out this website: »onthespotblog.com/the-hunt-for-r···ervices/
The players we know that are now involved, including names and cities are: Ambrosia Web Design LLC, Chris Ambrosia, Mesa, Arizona American Debt Negotiators, Ran David Barnea, Boca Raton, Florida Associated Accounting Specialists Inc., William R. Page, Port Saint Lucie, Florida Castle Rock Capital Management, Roy M. Cox, Laguna Niguel, California Concord Financial Advisors LLC, Lee Cestine, Mesa, Arizona Financial Services Solutions LLC, CEO Unknown, New York, New York PHL International, Mark Burton, Deerfield Beach, Florida Premiere Debt Solutions, CEO Unknown, Orlando, Florida Red Leaf Capital LLC, Leroy Castine, Mesa, Arizona
I have received more than 150 (I have them documented) calls from these criminals. I have filed more that 50 complaints with the FTC however due to the fact that they hide behind spoofed numbers I doubt that they will ever stop any of them. They ask for up front fees and charge your credit card without performing any services.
I find that I am getting great enjoyment by pressing 1 and talking to one of their "reps". I have a phony name, credit card number, and security code that I use. The only legitimate number that I give them is the customer service number from a credit card that I no longer use since the card raised my rates. I try to ask the criminals as many questions as possibe to keep them on the phone as long as I can. The scammers seem to get upset once they finally figure out that THEY are getting scammed. I guess they think their time is more valuable than mine.  |
|
 Reviews:
·Charter
| well, they called my cellphone, but since it was an unrecognized number, I didnt answer. Now its just relentless, and its a different number each time. Since number spoofing is now illegal, these fraudsters should be investigated, and despite the fact that the CID is spoofed, the phone companies still know where they originate and terminate. |
|
 Whip join:2009-01-23 Califon, NJ | reply to Ender3rd New number: 808-216-9287 |
|
|
|
 DrStrangeTechnically feasiblePremium join:2001-07-23 West Hartford, CT kudos:1 | That's cozy. They took their ill-gotten money and moved to Hawaii? |
|
 Reviews:
·Charter
| reply to Whip said by Whip:New number: 808-216-9287 Their number isnt important, because they are spoofing their numbers still(isnt that illegal now?), so, they will show up as whatever they want to. Im guessing they moved off shore, because the people that are calling me dont have a great grasp of english. |
|
 DrStrangeTechnically feasiblePremium join:2001-07-23 West Hartford, CT kudos:1 | Just attempting humor since the number, if it weren't spoofed, would be a cell phone in Honolulu.
808-216 = Nextel Communications, Inc. in Honolulu, HI.
If they're spoofing and using VOIP, they could be anywhere in the world. |
|
 Reviews:
·Charter
| said by DrStrange:If they're spoofing and using VOIP, they could be anywhere in the world. They are using VoIP for sure, but the phone companies can still tell you where/what IP address that call is originating from, even with spoofed info. They have to know, they just dont care.
»www.dailytech.com/Caller+ID+Spoo···8138.htm
callerID spoofing is now illegal, which is probably why they moved offshore. The telcos KNOW the info is spoofed, so why do they let the calls come thru? |
|
 DrStrangeTechnically feasiblePremium join:2001-07-23 West Hartford, CT kudos:1 | I agree with your complaint. There are instances of blocking VOIP calls to certain prefixes because the originating carrier doesn't want to pay the destination carrier extra for calling 'a rural exchange'. if they can do that, they should be able to do this.
There are people here who know more about the workings of telephones than I do, but I don't see why the originating carrier [or the destination] can't verify that the Caller ID matches the ANI info [for billing] that phones need to transmit when they call any number, and refuse to connect anyone whose info doesn't match the Caller ID info. |
|
 dbarron join:2000-01-03 Vancouver, BC Reviews:
·TELUS
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to Ender3rd We cancelled our land line a few months ago because the vast majority of calls we received were either telemarketers like this who ignored the do not call list, or politicians who are exempt. We still have the phone so visitors can call us from the front gate of our townhouse complex, so when the phone rings these days we are actually happy to hear it instead of dreading it. |
|
 | reply to DrStrange said by DrStrange:...I don't see why the originating carrier [or the destination] can't verify that the Caller ID matches the ANI info [for billing] that phones need to transmit when they call any number, and refuse to connect anyone whose info doesn't match the Caller ID info. That seems perfectly reasonable and should be done for everything within our borders as a part of our regular service. I'm not sure what can be done about traffic originating outside our borders and VOIP calls that seem to be in a league of their own, but if the destination end could handle that I'd pay a few extra bucks a month for that feature! -- Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. (Charlie Reese) |
|
 SnowymIRC unix.ro UnderNetPremium join:2003-04-05 Kailua, HI kudos:6 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Clearwire Wireless
| reply to Chubbysumo said by Chubbysumo:They are using VoIP for sure, but the phone companies can still tell you where/what IP address that call is originating from, even with spoofed info. They have to know, they just dont care. What does the originating IP have to do with anything? I'll answer that for you. Nothing. Absolutely nothing to be more precise. Hacked SIP enabled machines are what you'd find & there's enough of them to last an eternity. Going after the IP's would be a monumental waste of resources. |
|
 Reviews:
·Charter
| said by Snowy:said by Chubbysumo:They are using VoIP for sure, but the phone companies can still tell you where/what IP address that call is originating from, even with spoofed info. They have to know, they just dont care. What does the originating IP have to do with anything? I'll answer that for you. Nothing. Absolutely nothing to be more precise. Hacked SIP enabled machines are what you'd find & there's enough of them to last an eternity. Going after the IP's would be a monumental waste of resources. If its VoIP, the call has to originate somewhere. If they are getting a lot of hacked or spoofed numbers from VoIP(they still can tell im sure, if not, the volume of calls in a short time from a new number would give it away), they can still block the routing within their network from calls originating from that IP address. A VoIP call has to hit a traditional POTS network at some point, and they can block the IP from getting routed. |
|
 Whip join:2009-01-23 Califon, NJ | reply to Chubbysumo said by Chubbysumo:said by Whip:New number: 808-216-9287 Their number isnt important, because they are spoofing their numbers still(isnt that illegal now?), so, they will show up as whatever they want to. Im guessing they moved off shore, because the people that are calling me dont have a great grasp of english. That I understand but if peoplle want to block it that haven't gotten a call from it and it's possibly still being used, it gives them a leg up.
Todays number is: 805-309-9707 'CDS' on callerID. |
|
 SnowymIRC unix.ro UnderNetPremium join:2003-04-05 Kailua, HI kudos:6 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Clearwire Wireless
| reply to Chubbysumo
 Fig.1 |
said by Chubbysumo:If its VoIP, the call has to originate somewhere. If they are getting a lot of hacked or spoofed numbers from VoIP(they still can tell im sure, if not, the volume of calls in a short time from a new number would give it away), You are not taking into consideration the amount of failed calls that are occurring. The failure rate is considerable (see fig1) & that's how the miscreants know it's time to change it up. Their isn't a single or a few IP's involved. There will be dozens of them that come & go with a turnaround of a new batch as the previous batch becomes hot, sometimes in an hour or two. It comes down to playing a losing game of whack a mole.
|
|