| reply to retiredqwest
Re: Spokane, WA I'm kind suprised actually |
|
| Me Too!
I was told by a couple Comcast techs a month ago, there was no plans on upstream channel bonding in the Spokane area this year and maybe next. |
|
|
|
| Wayne....
You haven't learned not to ask the techs about things yet??
In all fairness and as a former outside tech, we are usually the last ones to hear about things like that.
And I don't recall when I first saw the 2 up channels..... its been a few weeks at least. |
|
andyrossPremium,MVM
join:2003-05-04
Schaumburg, IL
2 edits | reply to Johkal
Schaumburg, IL - Lost the multi-channel upstream My modem was rebooted overnight, and I lost the upstream bonding. Worse, it's now on the 32QAM channel. Even more interesting, it's now using 4 new frequencies for the downstream.
It used to be 693, 699, 705, and 711. Now it's 651, 657, 663, 693. |
|
 JohkalCool CatPremium,MVM
join:2002-11-13
Happy Valley
kudos:5
1 edit | Lost in State College, PA Well, unfortunately mine has also reverted back to 1 Upstream Channel.  I didn't reboot as you did. |
|
andyrossPremium,MVM
join:2003-05-04
Schaumburg, IL | Re: Schaumburg, IL - Lost the multi-channel upstream I didn't manually reboot it. From the logs, there were 2 reboots. The first around 2:07am, and the other around 4:41. Probably due to Comcast shifting the downstream channels around. |
|
JohkalCool CatPremium,MVM
join:2002-11-13
Happy Valley
kudos:5 | Looking at my log today, it appears that my modem rebooted sometime after 3 am. |
|
andyrossPremium,MVM
join:2003-05-04
Schaumburg, IL | Just remember that the modem's log does NOT take daylight savings into effect, so you need to add one hour to the time. |
|
JohkalCool CatPremium,MVM
join:2002-11-13
Happy Valley
kudos:5 Reviews:
 ·Comcast
| It's hard to tell anyway, because the time didn't sync after the T4 and other entries till much later.
Jul 14 2011 08:12:58 3-Critical R02.0 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=00:23:74:f1:ae:8a;CMTS-MAC=00:01:5c:24:7e:8b;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
Jan 01 1970 00:06:41 5-Warning R09.0 B-INIT-RNG Failure - Retries exceeded;CM-MAC=00:23:74:f1:ae:8a;CMTS-MAC=00:01:5c:24:7e:8b;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
Jan 01 1970 00:06:38 3-Critical R02.0 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=00:23:74:f1:ae:8a;CMTS-MAC=00:01:5c:24:7e:8b;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
Jan 01 1970 00:03:59 5-Warning R09.0 B-INIT-RNG Failure - Retries exceeded;CM-MAC=00:23:74:f1:ae:8a;CMTS-MAC=00:01:5c:24:7e:8b;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
Jan 01 1970 00:03:40 3-Critical R02.0 No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=00:23:74:f1:ae:8a;CMTS-MAC=00:01:5c:24:7e:8b;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
Jan 01 1970 00:00:12 6-Notice Cable Modem Reboot due to T4 timeout ;CM-MAC=00:23:74:f1:ae:8a;CMTS-MAC=00:00:00:00:00:00;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
Jul 14 2011 03:04:16 3-Critical R04.0 Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;CM-MAC=00:23:74:f1:ae:8a;CMTS-MAC=00:01:5c:24:7e:8b;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
Jul 14 2011 03:04:02 3-Critical T05.0 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Loss of Sync;CM-MAC=00:23:74:f1:ae:8a;CMTS-MAC=00:01:5c:24:7e:8b;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
--
In God we trust; all others bring data!
|
|
1 edit | reply to Johkal
Lost in Indiana, PA upstream bonding disappeared here too now |
|
altdel
join:2003-08-20
Danville, CA
1 edit | reply to Johkal
Lost in East Bay, SF Bay Area Modem rebooted itself 30 minutes ago, and lost upstream bonding here in East Bay, SF Bay Area. |
|
2 edits | reply to Johkal
Back to single channel in Clovis, CA My trusty 702G hasn't rebooted yet, so I still have 3 channels.
Edit - My hateful 702G just rebooted and now I'm down to 1 64 QAM channel. |
|
Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: Evidence of Upstream Channel Bonding - Post Here said by Oedipus:My trusty 702G hasn't rebooted yet, so I still have 3 channels.
Edit - My hateful 702G just rebooted and now I'm down to 1 64 QAM channel.
 |
|
Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to altdel
Still got 3 channels upstream here in Oakland, SF Bay Area said by altdel:Modem rebooted itself 30 minutes ago, and lost upstream bonding here in East Bay, SF Bay Area.
Gettin' close to home! Nothing in the log since July 9, when I rebooted the Ubee, myself, for s&g. I didn't see any info why this change in the service is happening. Oh, I guess it is a test, not an established part of service, as stated in this thread. |
|
| Still got 2 channels upstream here in Spokane, WA I rebooted my modem yesterday and it still has 2 upstream channels. But from the above I don't have some fantastic upload speeds.
I'm on Extreme 105/10 BTW. |
|
 Chris 313Come get somePremium
join:2004-07-18
Houma, LA
·Comcast
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·Comcast Digital ..
| said by retiredqwest:I rebooted my modem yesterday and it still has 2 upstream channels. But from the above I don't have some fantastic upload speeds.
I'm on Extreme 105/10 BTW.
What do you get for sustained download/upload speeds when downloading/uploading several large files from known fast sources? Judging from the picture, though, your upload looks fine to me. If your speed is 105/10 and you're getting 10 on the upload, you're getting your speed. And after the upgrade later this year, it'll be 105/20. |
|
1 edit | said by Chris 313:What do you get for sustained download/upload speeds when downloading/uploading several large files from known fast sources? Judging from the picture, though, your upload looks fine to me. If your speed is 105/10 and you're getting 10 on the upload, you're getting your speed. And after the upgrade later this year, it'll be 105/20.
Funny you ask.... I just tried Microsoft Technet on a Win7 3.1 G iso and it peaked at 2.9MB which would make it about 24Mb.
BUT, when I use Newsbin Pro I've hit 95 Mb at times w/20 connections....
FTP uploading to my website yields a whopping 75KB.....
They must throttle the upload speed.
Speedtest's and file transfer speeds are totally subjective to how much bandwidth the hosting site is willing to allocate.
Given a do over, I should have canceled the 100\10 in the 30 day window. |
|
 sortofageekNot TroublePremium,Mod
join:2001-08-19
There & Then
kudos:14 | reply to Johkal
(topic move) Signals decline with loss of upstream bondingModerator Action
The post that was here (and all 1 followups to it), has been moved to a new topic .. »Signals decline with loss of upstream bonding |
|
