said by RDC17:Exactly. The president of a single gay and lesbian oriented organization endorsed the deal. Then when others got wind of it, they questioned it, to the point of his submitting his resignation. One man does not equal "the gays". In fact, one single organization does not equal "the gays". The fact that this resulted in his resignation shows how much he does NOT speak for the group, much less the entire gay and lesbian community.
It doesn't say, but the president endorsed the deal on behalf of his organization, and now GLAAD has decided that the money isn't worth supporting a deal that has nothing to do with the mission of their organization.
Again, your take from this article is baseless.