PX EliezerPremium
join:2008-08-09
Hutt River
kudos:13 Reviews:
 ·callwithus
·voip.ms
·Optimum Voice
·Vitelity VOIP
·Gizmo5
| reply to mazilo
Re: [Skype] Can't buy "Skype for Asterisk" after July I agree with Mazilo on this one. 
He made a good suggestion. Some people here could carry it out, while others (including me) don't have the expertise for it. But it does not detract from the value of what he suggested.
Mazilo has been very helpful with these sorts of issues to many people.
-----------------------------------------
There must be a SpongeBob marathon on TV today because there is a lot of Krabby Patty going around. |
|
| On a related note, I am wondering what going to happen in the future for MSN. Will Microsoft keep it continuing as is or will also be a paid service? In addition, does anyone have any idea, or even rumors/speculations, about what Google will do regarding gtalk/google voice? I don't track these very closely so please forgive me for my ignorance. |
|
| said by twinclouds:On a related note, I am wondering what going to happen in the future for MSN. Will Microsoft keep it continuing as is or will also be a paid service? In addition, does anyone have any idea, or even rumors/speculations, about what Google will do regarding gtalk/google voice? I don't track these very closely so please forgive me for my ignorance.
i do not think anyone knows the answer except those who read the highly confidential corporate memos, if there even are any memos speaking of such things.
if i had to take a guess i would say in a couple years the skype technology/P2P protocol will be powering the new version of MSN/Live messenger, and the actually skype branded service will have been retired.
perhaps existing skypenames will become Microsoft live ID's in the form: skypename@skype.net |
|
gweidenh
join:2002-05-18
Houston, TX
kudos:1 | reply to PX Eliezer
said by PX Eliezer:I agree with Mazilo on this one.
He made a good suggestion. Some people here could carry it out, while others (including me) don't have the expertise for it.
I disagree. For SFA to (continue to) work, code would have to be written on both sides. The Asterisk module and the Skype module.
How do you propose we change Skypes code? |
|
maziloFrom MaziloPremium
join:2002-05-30
Lilburn, GA
kudos:1 | said by gweidenh:said by PX Eliezer:I agree with Mazilo on this one.
He made a good suggestion. Some people here could carry it out, while others (including me) don't have the expertise for it. I disagree. For SFA to (continue to) work, code would have to be written on both sides. The Asterisk module and the Skype module. Whether you agree or not it is irrelevant here because this reverse engineered Skype source code has nothing to do with SFA. SFA (Skype For Asterisk) is a proprietary code while the reverse engineered Skype source code has just been recently released to the public isn't.
How do you propose we change Skypes code?
--
don't and stop are the ONLY two 4-letter words considered offensive to men, but not when used together. |
|
|
|
