reply to CanerisErik
Re: fw5 project with TSI
said by CanerisErik:Im OK with losing a little bit of throughput, its more important that it is really reliable in handing problems (not saying that tomato/mlppp isnt, but I need more horsepower in a small package). Like line re-syncs, maintenance windows by TSI, etc.
It should still work against their Juniper LNSs, though not tested in a couple of releases and it won't be as optimal as going against our LNSs. This is because the round-robin implementation is different and is done identically on our LNSs too, so you'll lose a little throughput against their LNSs.
OptionsDSL Wireless Internet