Billy B
join:2006-03-22
Robbinsville, NC | reply to Smith6612
Re: [Internet] For anyone seeing speed issues... Good Morning Smith6612.
Just a quick follow-up posting with the results from my latest & repeat ping test performed at 8AM this morning.
Clearly my initial ping "without load" was around 55MS and then changed to the 170 / 180 MS range while downloading the 100 MB file before returning to "normal"
Significantly for me and evidence that your theory about congestion being my local problem is that yesterday the kids all returned to school and my speedtest results showed my normal 2.87 DL speed all day and into the evening.
Thanks for everything, I really do appreciate the help and education. Billy B.
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Pinging 10.37.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=185ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=184ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 10.37.1.1: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=126
Ping statistics for 10.37.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 103, Received = 103, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 54ms, Maximum = 185ms, Average = 137ms
Control-C
^C |
|
 Smith6612Premium,MVM
join:2008-02-01
North Tonawanda, NY
kudos:22
 ·Verizon Online DSL
·Frontier Communi..
| Your first hop latency is still rather high for a FastPath line, but I'm glad to hear the speed has returned. I'm hoping Frontier is bringing in more bandwidth and figuring out the best way to route things however. A high speed line doesn't mean anything if first hop latency is higher than 15ms on FastPath. |
|
