BlueC
@cptelecom.net
| Metro Ethernet: 2821 vs. 2921 router
We're currently looking at a Cisco 2821 router for a 40mbps Ethernet handoff. Although I feel that the 2821 might be a bit underpowered for our needs (80-90 users, residential) and QoS is a top priority. Not to mention it seems a bit outdated.
I've read varying threads here stating the capabilities of the 2811/2821 and how CPU usage gets maxed out fairly easily. I want to ensure that we choose a router that can scale to at least 80mbps since we can scale our line to 100mbps quite easily.
Would the 2921 be appropriate for this setup? I would assume the multi-core processor is a necessary improvement with today's standards.
Our current setup is a Cisco 1700 series router with a 10mbps ethernet connection (which is being maxed out quite often). So anything will be an improvement. What I want to avoid is using a router that cannot handle the available throughput offered from our ISP and fails to properly manage traffic as needed. I also want a router that we can keep around for at least a few years and not seem outdated in terms of throughput capabilities.
Thoughts? |
|
kamikatze
join:2007-11-02
2 edits | Nobody really knows what the 1900/2900/3900 series is capable of in real life at this moment, i'd say don't miss this show:
»bit.ly/PzfkP
quote:
Is it worth upgrading your routers for a faster processor and a little more
memory? When it comes down to it, networking has gone through a major paradigm
shift. From HD video to virtualization to cloud extensibility to custom
crafted hacks, the days of bordered networks are long gone. To address this
need Cisco has had to break the mold and traditional roles to design a router
like none other.
Join TechWiseTV's Chief Geek Jimmy Ray Purser as he hosts Cisco ISR G2 Routing Specialist Matt Lambert for a deep technical dive into Cisco latest router the ISR G2. This interactive WebEx workshop will feature demos, and a look into the architecture without the marketing spin.
Jimmy Ray Purser from Cisco usually doesn't talk marketing smack. Should be interesting.
As for the 2821, yes it is underpowered for 80Mbps with services. I wouldn't touch anything smaller than a 3845 for QoS at those speeds. |
|
BlueC
@cptelecom.net
| Thanks for the tip. However, I do wonder if the 3845 is kind of an overkill since we really only need an Ethernet data solution, no need for voice (other than VOIP which runs over data), T1/T3 connections, etc.
I just need a proper router than can handle Ethernet throughput and still manage QoS. Perhaps I am looking at the wrong line of products? Trying to keep costs somewhat reasonable but am willing to spend what is needed and not cut corners. I thought the 2921 with the extra memory and faster processor (multi-core verus single) would be enough for 40-80mbps, but then again, that seems to be a bit unclear since it's a new product. |
|
cooldude9919
join:2000-05-29
Cape Girardeau, MO
clubs:
2 edits | said by BlueC :
Thanks for the tip. However, I do wonder if the 3845 is kind of an overkill since we really only need an Ethernet data solution, no need for voice (other than VOIP which runs over data), T1/T3 connections, etc.
I just need a proper router than can handle Ethernet throughput and still manage QoS. Perhaps I am looking at the wrong line of products? Trying to keep costs somewhat reasonable but am willing to spend what is needed and not cut corners. I thought the 2921 with the extra memory and faster processor (multi-core verus single) would be enough for 40-80mbps, but then again, that seems to be a bit unclear since it's a new product.
If you arent doing any crypto traffic and minimial services (qos plus?) the 2821 would probably be OK. Honestly an 1811 might be OK too, because on pure ethernet performance it is close to a 2821, given the 2821 has gigabit ports.
We have 2 3845s, and once you start throwing crypto traffic at them the cpu starts getting hit pretty hard.
heres the current status of our 3845.
5 minute input rate 6295000 bits/sec, 1863 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 37542000 bits/sec, 4920 packets/sec
CPU utilization for five seconds: 41%/37%; one minute: 43%; five minutes: 37% |
|
ladino
join:2001-02-24
USA
| I would go for the 2921 since ISR G2 is the direction that Cisco is going to. Talk to your Cisco sales rep, get a Demo unit. This way you can play with the new ISR G2. You can then use this decision your future MetroE or other high speed links & thus future-prove yourself. |
|
BlueC
@cptelecom.net
| reply to cooldude9919
Thanks guys. I think I will find out how soon we can get a 2921. Cisco essentially rates the capability about 5x compared to the 2821. I think we would be fine with up to 100mbps with the 2921. Probably have a bit of room above 100mbps for future upgrades. |
|
cooldude9919
join:2000-05-29
Cape Girardeau, MO
clubs:
| said by BlueC :
Thanks guys. I think I will find out how soon we can get a 2921. Cisco essentially rates the capability about 5x compared to the 2821. I think we would be fine with up to 100mbps with the 2921. Probably have a bit of room above 100mbps for future upgrades.
Yea if you have the money i would go for the 2921. The 2900 series looks like what the 2800 series should have been in the first place. |
|
kamikatze
join:2007-11-02
| So being the troll that i am, i trolled a bit the ISR G2 webex.
I got nothing. I'm gonna crack open every single ISR G2 i get my hands on  |
|
cooldude9919
join:2000-05-29
Cape Girardeau, MO
clubs:
| said by kamikatze  :So being the troll that i am, i trolled a bit the ISR G2 webex. I got nothing. I'm gonna crack open every single ISR G2 i get my hands on haha good stuff.
For the price i dont see the x900 series competing with the 1811 on ethernet performance do you?
Now if you need good ethernet performance and some wic or NM slots then that may be a different story. |
|
kamikatze
join:2007-11-02
1 edit | I can't disclose that information. Ha ha ha. |
|
deepblackmag
join:2004-12-27
00000
1 edit | So we got the official word from Cisco in their presentation yesterday.
The 3945 is designed to handle "150mbps" at most. This is a step up from the 3845s which were more 45mbps~ish.
The lower end routers are still lower end routers designed for their previous tasks. A 2911 is still designed to be just a NxT1 router but its designed to run more services than the 2811.
Cisco still hasnt provided me the PPS details i requested from them. To my knowledge none of their sales presentation is NDA. These details should all be trickling out very soon.
If you are seriously pushing 100mbps and up, i would still go with a 7200. They are probablly the most economical choice unless ur looking at ISRg2 specific features like the video-on-pvdms. |
|
kamikatze
join:2007-11-02
3 edits | 
ISR G2 Family Throughput |
The CPU might be multicore, but the IOS is still an old monolithic approach and there's no SMP support yet (if ever). And no there's not going to be an IOS XE for the ISRs (i asked ).
Routerperformance.pdf has been also updated:
»www.cisco.com/web/partners/downl···ance.pdf
ASR1000's digits are jaw-dropping. |
|
deepblackmag
join:2004-12-27
00000
1 edit | I have had the same gripes about the 5580 ASA platform. Its got all those cores, and all that ram, but its still a 32bit image running on 64bit hardware.
The software is lagging behind the ability to truly use the hardware they are loading it on.
Also, the ASR numbers look fairly accurate. I am using them to provide L2 MPLS ethernet pseudowires between datacenters across sonet infrastructure. Those things can take anything we have thrown at them in any role. |
|
