Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Networking » [Windows] ADSL 4100 ft 900ms latency
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
292
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
pfsense open port 53 »
« bittorrent performance  
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


glassr

@verizon.net

[Windows] ADSL 4100 ft 900ms latency

Our business has 2 Covad DSL connections. Our SDSL 768K is awesome. We use VOIP over the internet with it and pings are 19ms consistently. Voice quality with G711 is awesome.

We also have an ADSL 8/1 connection in the office for internet connected to our firewall/data network. I connect from home - Verison FIOs 10/2 (VPN/Remote Desktop) to that network and it crawls. I check ping times periodically and I get ping times close to 1000ms, but consistently at 500ms. Occasionally, I see ping times in the teens and the remote desktop moves nicely. Usually, it sucks. When I ping and check a speedtest from my home network without being connected to the VPN, pings are in the teens and I see close to 10/2.

Covad changed the backhaul and when they do it, ping times drop to the teens for a short while then move to 500s. They ping their router and see the ping times. They sent a tech out and he saw nothing wrong. My IT people said they isolated the problem by removing our network and saw slow speeds before the network. We disconnected the network and Covad was unable to ping the router.

Bottom line, something is wrong because my remote experience is awful on the ADSL and ping times are clearly unacceptable. The other DSL line is amazing and we are 4100 feet from the CO.

Help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can my network with outlook, a database called goldmine, and not much else be causing the problem?

Napsterbater
Premium
join:2002-12-28
Milledgeville, GA
·Windstream
·BroadVoice

What are you using to run the VPN on your end? windows or a piece of hardware?

If using windows did you make sure to turn off "Use default gateway on the remote network", if its on all of your traffic on that computer goes though the VPN not just work stuff, so your ping will have a high latency to say google.

»stevenharman.net/blog/archive/20···ays.aspx

Note you might have to leave it on depending on the network setup, I'm not sure.
--
ASUS M4A79T Deluxe | AMD Phenom II x3 720 BE AM3 @ 3.5Ghz(OC) | 4Gb DDR3 Memory @ 1600mhz | Sapphire ATI HD4870 1GB 800mhz/1000mhz(OC) | 2x500GB HDD's Raid 0 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Build 7600 (RTM) | Windstream DSL 12m (14.9m Sync)/766k

glassr

join:2009-10-31
Columbia, MD

The office network accepts incoming vpn calls. I connect from Windows vista to a piece of hardware, I believe. Once I am connected, if I ping something from my pc, I believe I get speeds thru the VPN. I am not sure this is significant because when I disconnect from the vpn, pings to my office network ip address are still 500-1000ms.

Napsterbater
Premium
join:2002-12-28
Milledgeville, GA
Run a tracert to your VPN address (the address or IP you are connecting to) and post it here.

Block out the remote IP/Name.

glassr

join:2009-10-31
Columbia, MD

This tracert is from after my home ip address (which was low ms) to the ip address in my office, 13 hops.

3 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms
0.162]
4 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms
8.82]
5 44 ms 24 ms 29 ms
9.118]
6 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms
7 16 ms 14 ms 14 ms
8 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms
9 16 ms 13 ms 14 ms
10 13 ms 14 ms 14 ms
11 19 ms 15 ms 16 ms
12 * * *
13 493 ms 782 ms 716 ms

Napsterbater
Premium
join:2002-12-28
Milledgeville, GA
·Windstream
·BroadVoice

There something up on the connection used for the VPN ethier the line is having issues, the DSLAM its on is having issues or the line is being overloaded.

My guess would be to check traffic levels, I betting something is using all of the bandwidth witch could cause this.
--
ASUS M4A79T Deluxe | AMD Phenom II x3 720 BE AM3 @ 3.5Ghz(OC) | 4Gb DDR3 Memory @ 1600mhz | Sapphire ATI HD4870 1GB 800mhz/1000mhz(OC) | 2x500GB HDD's Raid 0 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Build 7600 (RTM) | Windstream DSL 12m (14.9m Sync)/766k

glassr

join:2009-10-31
Columbia, MD

Covad has looked at utilization and noone is in my office now. Utilization has been very low. There are 6 people in my office. We use Outlook, Goldmine (a relationship database with a sequal server) and regular internet surfing (noone is surfing right now). Covad says it is my network causing the high pings and slow speeds and my IT people say there is nothing on my network making that happen. Aside from workstation enduser streaming, etc., what on my network could be creating such high ping times and slowing speeds? We get nowhere near the 8/1.

Covad ADSL 8/1 comes into my office, ethernet plugs into Covad supplied motorola router supplying 5 static IPs. Our office firewall is a rideway and is has a static ip address, after that is our network with harddrive server, database server and outlook server. What could cause the problem?

Very frustrated. Thanks.

Napsterbater
Premium
join:2002-12-28
Milledgeville, GA
Any Chance you can provide a tracert from work to say google?

If you can leave the private IPs and * out the last 2 sections of the public Ips, that way we can see where the problem starts hopefully.

glassr

join:2009-10-31
Columbia, MD


1 edit
Will do that tracert, but just did one from home to office and got below results. Is that weird? And pings are in the 100s 200s 300s 30s 40s 20s, very varied. Maybe after 5p it goes bad, not sure.

3 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms
0.162]
4 30 ms 9 ms 9 ms
8.82]
5 12 ms 11 ms 12 ms
9.118]
6 44 ms 12 ms 13 ms
7 11 ms 12 ms 22 ms
8 11 ms 12 ms 12 ms
9 11 ms 12 ms 12 ms
10 14 ms 11 ms 12 ms
11 16 ms 14 ms 14 ms
12 * * *
13 20 ms 19 ms 19 ms

glassr

join:2009-10-31
Columbia, MD

Because I'm not in the office, I VPN'd in and remote desktopped. I ran a trace rt from that desktop to google twice.

3 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms

4 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms

5 232 ms 10 ms 8 ms

6 474 ms 12 ms 8 ms

7 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms

8 8 ms 8 ms 72 ms

9 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms

10 23 ms 23 ms 25 ms

11 72 ms 25 ms 26 ms

12 31 ms 36 ms 32 ms

13 26 ms 381 ms 328 ms

3 221 ms 49 ms 38 ms

4 222 ms 22 ms 17 ms

5 24 ms 8 ms 8 ms

6 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms

7 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms

8 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms

9 9 ms 10 ms 286 ms

10 53 ms 24 ms 24 ms

11 24 ms 26 ms 25 ms

12 28 ms 35 ms 32 ms

13 25 ms 23 ms 24 ms

glassr

join:2009-10-31
Columbia, MD

One more and Remote desktop seems even slower at this time.

3 346 ms 125 ms 163 ms

4 86 ms 240 ms 224 ms

5 105 ms 309 ms 60 ms

6 228 ms 70 ms 279 ms

7 245 ms 170 ms 289 ms

8 461 ms 132 ms 198 ms

9 182 ms 427 ms 349 ms

10 391 ms 165 ms 195 ms

11 694 ms 155 ms 290 ms

12 329 ms 167 ms 182 ms

13 357 ms 76 ms 85 ms

Napsterbater
Premium
join:2002-12-28
Milledgeville, GA
On the last tracert what did the ping look like on the first two hops?

glassr

join:2009-10-31
Columbia, MD
8 1 1
2 2 2

From the desktop pc to the firewall then to the covad router

glassr

join:2009-10-31
Columbia, MD
not sure if it matters, but ping from desktop to my firewall is low, to router is low and ping to google.com is in the 3, 4, 5 and 600s. Does that mean it is not my internal network that is causing the problems? Covad continues to blame my network.

Napsterbater
Premium
join:2002-12-28
Milledgeville, GA
·Windstream
·BroadVoice

It means its looking more like a covad problem, have you tried a different modem on that line to test? Maybe when possible just use a modem and computer connected directly to it just to rule everything else out and make covad dig deeper on there side.
--
ASUS M4A79T Deluxe | AMD Phenom II x3 720 BE AM3 @ 3.5Ghz(OC) | 4Gb DDR3 Memory @ 1600mhz | Sapphire ATI HD4870 1GB 800mhz/1000mhz(OC) | 2x500GB HDD's Raid 0 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Build 7600 (RTM) | Windstream DSL 12m (14.9m Sync)/766k


tim_k
Buttons, Bows, Beamer, Shadow, Kasey
Premium
join:2002-02-02
Stewartstown, PA
reply to glassr
Most likely they are getting errors on a network backbone in the CO. Try the 'pathping' command and see if it shows any errors.

glassr

join:2009-10-31
Columbia, MD
what do i type after pathping

Napsterbater
Premium
join:2002-12-28
Milledgeville, GA
·Windstream
·BroadVoice

"pathping www.google.com"

or where ever you want to path ping to.

But I dont see what its going to tell you that we don't already see.\

The next trouble shooting step is to try a different modem and have a computer directly connected to it at a time when you see the elevated pings, if you still get them then it up to Covad at that point to track down and fix the problem.
--
ASUS M4A79T Deluxe | AMD Phenom II x3 720 BE AM3 @ 3.5Ghz(OC) | 4Gb DDR3 Memory @ 1600mhz | Sapphire ATI HD4870 1GB 800mhz/1000mhz(OC) | 2x500GB HDD's Raid 0 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Build 7600 (RTM) | Windstream DSL 12m (14.9m Sync)/766k

glassr

join:2009-10-31
Columbia, MD
Our office IT people told me they run a backup of our servers over the internet to their office. The backup can take 4 hours or so every night. Could that internet traffic increase ping times to 4, 5, 600 or higher?

efflandt

join:2002-01-25
Elgin, IL
·AT&T Midwest


1 edit
said by glassr See Profile :

Our office IT people told me they run a backup of our servers over the internet to their office. The backup can take 4 hours or so every night. Could that internet traffic increase ping times to 4, 5, 600 or higher?
Certainly that could increase your ping if your line is choked with net traffic because ping is low priority (and not actually required at all except for testing).

We have AT&T branded Covad 1.5 mbps SDSL (from before AT&T remerged with SBC), and have only had issues with it once in many years (bad connection on card in telco CO). We use SonicWall routers for VPN to our factory 1700 miles away for 6-8 PC's and 2 printers that print from factory (besides locally). Although, our factory has a DS3 connection because it has many VPN's connected to it.
-
Forums » Up and Running » Networkingpfsense open port 53 »
« bittorrent performance  
page: 1 · 2


Sunday, 29-Nov 07:36:59 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [73] Weekend Open Thread
· [72] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Samsung LCD TV No Picture but has Sound [Electronics]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· Security Software Updates - 28 Nov 2009 [Security]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]