| No. No.
Seriously though...the percentage of folks who'd have access to free ISP-provided wifi has to be minuscule. |
|
 JeffreyConnoisseur of leisurely thingsPremium
join:2002-12-24
Long Island
kudos:3
 ·Verizon FiOS
 ·Vonage
| Nope. If they have it, it's a bonus. It's not a deal-breaker or maker. Reliability, speed, price. If they have Wi-Fi, great, but not a big concern for me.
I have been a CV subscriber (again) for 9 months now, and I've used the wi-fi once.
--
"Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy." - George Carlin |
|
 Matt3All noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | reply to Hazy Arc
said by Hazy Arc:No. Seriously though...the percentage of folks who'd have access to free ISP-provided wifi has to be minuscule. I agree. I could care less. Perhaps if I lived in Manhattan and the streets were blanketed with it, sure. But on the go 3G is usually good enough. |
|
| reply to Hazy Arc
no, free is free |
|
 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to Jeffrey
Exactly. AT&T offers free WiFi on its Uverse, yet I have TWC, as the total package is a bit cheaper. |
|
|
|
| reply to Hazy Arc
said by Hazy Arc:No. Seriously though...the percentage of folks who'd have access to free ISP-provided wifi has to be minuscule. Furthermore, the percentage of people who'd have a choice in the matter of what ISP they desire is probably even smaller. |
|
| reply to Hazy Arc
No.
Its pointless, I never use it, too much hassle trying to connect and to find some place that has it.
I have an iphone and I use 3g on it when Im out, its more annoying to connect to wifi on the iphone because if Im walking around and its constantly just connecting to a wifi hotspot as I walk out of range of it, this is why I leave wifi off.
The only time it is useful is when its in a hotel, and even then its usually slow, too weak of a signal, or it costs $$ a fee each day. |
|
