said by Exit :

In american I'm sure they would sue you for taking a photo of their building without permission

said by bostechie :

With all due respect, that's just silly...
While the US no longer really practices democracy, instead corporatism, I don't think I'd go so far as to agree with your biased (US bashing) statement. Furthermore, your statement has nothing to do with my question.

It is a building in open view so the company hasn't any reasonable expectation of privacy.

said by jvmorris :

Technically (at least in the US) all building designs are copyrighted...
An image of the building, however, is not, especially if taken from a public right-of-way.

said by oblong :

however, you did ask if it is worthy?
may i suggest three variations?
the moon is nice, in blue hour, and the building lights are nice too. but the moon looks oblong, from the time exposure? and has no details from overexposure. try redoing it without the moon but with the blue background. or paste in a detailed moon exposure for the moon is similar to that for a sunlit object on earth.

or leave the moon out, by redoing or pasting a bit of blue sky over it, since they will be wanting a photo of their building, not of their moon.

try, in camera, or in computer, to get the building verticals vertical, etc, so it doesn't look like it is falling over. in the field you get that by keeping the camera vertical, not tilted up, or by using an expensive shift lens.

said by grendal :

instead of guessing, here's the copyright law regarding images of buildings.

»www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#120

from wikipedia.org

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:···uildings

Buildings are works subject to copyright in the U.S. according to 17 USC 102(a)(8) since the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act was passed in 1990. It applies to all buildings that were completed (not begun) after December 1, 1990, or where the plans were published after that date. However, the U.S. federal copyright law explicitly exempts photographs of such copyrighted buildings from the copyright of the building in 17 USC 120(a). Anyone may take photographs of buildings from public places. The photographer holds the exclusive copyright to such an image (the architect or owner of the building has no say whatsoever), and may publish the image in any way.

said by grendal :

instead of guessing, here's the copyright law regarding images of buildings.

»www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#120

from wikipedia.org

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:···uildings

Buildings are works subject to copyright in the U.S. according to 17 USC 102(a)(8) since the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act was passed in 1990. It applies to all buildings that were completed (not begun) after December 1, 1990, or where the plans were published after that date. However, the U.S. federal copyright law explicitly exempts photographs of such copyrighted buildings from the copyright of the building in 17 USC 120(a). Anyone may take photographs of buildings from public places. The photographer holds the exclusive copyright to such an image (the architect or owner of the building has no say whatsoever), and may publish the image in any way.