Changing Polarization - dslreports.com

republican-creole			Search:
	login · register

	All Forums		Hot Topics		Gallery

how-to block ads

Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service Providers » Changing Polarization


Uniqs: 198	Share Topic:	RSS topic:	toggle: flat / full normal / watch	Posting:	Post a:	Post a:

Links: ·WISP Forum FAQ ·WISP Directory ·WISP Forum Frappr Map ·Radio Mobile

[Equipment] First time 900 Canopy configuration »
« Who runs around after storms to fix customers?

Equis Premium join:2005-03-18 Australia	Changing Polarization Hello I would like to run 2x 900 canopy units on the same frequency, same pole, same direction using sync. If I change the Polarization of one yagi could I expect to have about a 10db loss/separation? Thanks
	permalink · 2009-07-02 00:07:45 ·

Smokeshow Premium join:2009-02-26 Cold Lake, AB	Re: Changing Polarization 900 AP's or SM's? If they are SM's, then are they on the same AP? We need a bit more info on this one. Generally, if you are using sync properly, you should be fine running on the same polarization
	permalink · 2009-07-02 00:16:03 ·

Equis Premium join:2005-03-18 Australia	Hello I have 2 AP's very very close and was hoping that using opposite Polarization on one of them (Ap and all its sms) would stop the other AP's sm's screaming at the wrong AP just wondering how much it would help
	permalink · 2009-07-02 00:21:25 ·

Mad Dawg Mad Dawg Premium join:2006-03-19	Re: Changing Polarization In theory you should have 20 db of separaton by using opposite polarity but as smokeshow said if your using the sync abilities on the motos it shouldnt matter
	permalink · 2009-07-02 08:54:50 ·

IntraLink Premium,MVM join:2002-08-14 Utah Valley	That's probably not going to work on the same channel. You would need a lot of physical separation like maybe 100 feet to get anything out of the cross polarization on the AP side.
	permalink · 2009-07-02 09:57:36 ·

AMD Phreak Premium join:2003-12-14	Same direction will not work, as Intralink has suggested. Even with sync you will be mashing the front end of the receiver every time someone talks back to the cluster. This will occur even with cross-polarization as the radio reciever sensitivity is very high in comparison to what the received signal will be. Vertical spacing will be the only potential solution, and even then I have my doubts.
	permalink · 2009-07-02 10:34:53 ·

your comment..

Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service Providers	[Equipment] First time 900 Canopy configuration » « Who runs around after storms to fix customers?


Tuesday, 24-Nov 06:49:52	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF

Most commented news this week
· [85] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [58] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [29] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [27] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [13] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [12] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [7] Monday Morning Links

Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· IE8 InPrivate filter from adblock plus list [Microsoft Help]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]
· DIR-655 1.32 firmware - DNS relay issue (fixed) [D-Link]
· [NV] Speed Upgrade [Cox HSI]