Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » comments on review of Etheric Networks » Service to this customer is good - but customer uses huge bw
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

tcraig

join:2009-03-07
·Etheric Networks

reply to aligzanduh
Re: Service to this customer is good - but customer uses huge bw

My usage is no different than the average internet user.
Latest interent speed tests.
Speed Test #73090772 by dslreports.com
Run: 2009-06-11 22:47:08 EST
Download: 2381 (Kbps)
Upload: 69 (Kbps)
In kilobytes per second: 290.6 down 8.4 up
Tested by server: 55 java
User: 1627060 @ dslreports.com
User's DNS: etheric.net

no router connected, usages is very very low

aligzanduh
Premium
join:2003-02-04
Mountain View, CA

Click for full size
Utilization
Click for full size
From Tower To Google.com
Click for full size
From Tower to Customer Location
First of all let me say if the customer thinks our customer service is bad - he is right. He is the customer. We must examine how to improve our service to him.

In this case - I went back and looked at a sample period for traffic load:

Here were the average network loads:

Hour 1: Average 0.8 megabits per second
Hour 3: Average 5.25 megabits per second
Hour 5: Average 8.64 megabits per second
Hour 7: Average 3.57 megabits per second
Hour 9,11,13: Average 1.5 megabits per second
Hour 15: Average 6.34 megabits per second

This amounts to over 1000 gigabytes of data a month.

With the previous rate plan we imposed on this radio, the subscriber would have experienced severe latency during 3 of 8 samples.

We buy bandwidth at Equinix from many tier 1 providers, but it does have a cost.

I do believe this subscriber must have been poorly served - but at the same time I have told him for all these years - he is way over our typical guiidelines for Residential Silver service which has been 100 to 200 gigabytes a month.

This subscriber does not believe there is heavy use - and that is apparently my failure - in not resolving this issue.

Nonetheless my repeated warnings have been ignored, causing our staff to scratch their heads when this subscriber calls in - because there are no defects on his circuit in our monitoring tools.

I will be happy to post additional information to back this assertion up.

We are often flexible with heavy users, but if they want to draw big resources some additional monthly service charge is necessary in order for us not to lose money.
-
Forums » comments on review of Etheric Networks


Tuesday, 24-Nov 05:46:51 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [84] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [55] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [29] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [26] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [13] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [12] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [7] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· DIR-655 1.32 firmware - DNS relay issue (fixed) [D-Link]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]