Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T Still Can't Force Arbitration Via Fine Print » Abitration is a scam
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Shelleyp

@sbcglobal.net

from:
viperlmw See Profile
loadmaster See Profile

reply to ptrowski
Re: Abitration is a scam

No, I'm not a lawyer. My name is Shelley Powers. I write about technology for a living. I also happen to be a passionate supporter for consumer rights. Enough so that I took the time to understand the issues.


TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day

join:2006-07-30
Ocean Gate, NJ


1 edit
Class actions are the lesser of two evils. Are 500,000 people going to individually hire a lawyer and go after AA&T (or whoever) for the less than $100 dollars that they owe them? Are those people going individually sue for the shit service they received? No.

You can bring up weak class action suits like the Airborne class action all day long. But without class action suits companies are made to be responsible, where they would not normally be if individuals had to sue to get what is due to them.


pepe382104

@northwestern.edu

reply to Shelleyp
You should definitely get a second opinion. The truth is, the vast majority of class action lawsuits do not benefit the consumer in a significant fashion and favor the attorneys monetarily. There's nothing wrong with looking our for the rights of the consumer as look as you do it objectively and in an informed manner.

ross

join:2000-08-16
·Digizip

reply to TK Junk Mail
said by TK Junk Mail See Profile :

Class actions are the lesser of two evils. Are 500,000 people going to individually hire a lawyer and go after AA&T (or whoever) for the less than $100 dollars that they owe them? Are those people going individually sue for the shit service they received? No.

You can bring up weak class action suits like the Airborne class action all day long. But without class action suits companies are made to be responsible, where they would not normally be if individuals had to sue to get what is due to them.
Don't you mean "WITH"?


TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day

join:2006-07-30
Ocean Gate, NJ

said by ross See Profile :

said by TK Junk Mail See Profile :

Don't you mean "WITH"?
LoL. Yes, with.
-
Forums » AT&T Still Can't Force Arbitration Via Fine Print


Thursday, 26-Nov 23:24:11 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [112] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [62] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [54] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [37] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [35] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Not strictly "Home" related - but WOW anyways... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· New exploit masquerades as Flash Player upgrade [Security]