en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to Hydraglass
Re: LTE2
Most wireless devices would be consuming too much CPU to handle process high data rates to be currently useful.
Email at 1.5Mbps - active sync runs in seconds.
At 100Mbps... it runs in... second or 2 ?
At 1.5Mbps... emails appear in an instant. 100Mbps would give HDTV. I use Google maps, and it does appear in an instant.
Making full use of data over a months period (some YouTube, remote desktop, MS-patching (yeah - If I'm using a datacard... I want to be able to patch my own PC). I may not expect a +300 GB cap... but I do expect a reasonsable amount of use.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
JosephN
join:2009-05-12
| I agree 100%. I see the wireless carriers' need for _reasonable_ cap, but 5GB is a joke.
I'm happy with the speed of my EVDO connection, it's essentially as fast as the device will handle. OTOH, I bump into that 5GB cap, because I listen to a lot of internet radio. With Hulu, the cap would be a total joke.
I sure wouldn't want to be so limited that I had to stop by the datacenter whenever I needed to download a large file. I'd flat out go back to dial up before I'd put up with a carrier that wouldn't handle large files. |
|
