Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
 ·North State Commun..
| reply to KrK
Re: Assumptions....
said by KrK  :"We assume slinging will be ok over 3G when AT&T ultimately releases an application that place shifts AT&T U-Verse content to iPhones using the exact same network."You know what happens when you ASSUME....  You know what though, I bet Karl's 100% right. I hate dragging out this term, but this is what Net Neutrality advocates need to stay focused on. If AT&T prohibits me from "slinging" my TV signal over 3G, but allows their U-Verse service to work over it, we have a huge problem. After all, I'm not even in an AT&T U-Verse (or DSL, or anything) service area and neither are millions of people.
I'll be interested to see how this plays out or if they change their tune when they migrate to LTE. |
|
KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
 ·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| Absolutely, I agree... but I wouldn't go so far as assuming it will be so.... I'm betting someone will have to call them on it, and then they will have to face the fear of regulation, before they cave.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
|
|
Neyland
join:2003-02-04
USA
| reply to Matt
Actually they said, large amounts of data.. this leaves the door open for them to place shift with U-Verse if their app uses 'less data'...
Sometimes I just wish Wireless internet access capability == wired internet access capability, open access to devices, cats and dogs sleeping together... |
|
S_engineer
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL
·Comcast
| reply to KrK
said by KrK : and then they will have to face the fear of regulation, your "assuming" the legislators have the best interest of the consumer in mind rather than the ATT. This just means that ATT will have to up their gratuity to the politicians who have proven that they don't have a clue on broadband matters! |
|
psx_defector
join:2001-06-09
Allen, TX
| reply to Matt
said by Matt :If AT&T prohibits me from "slinging" my TV signal over 3G, but allows their U-Verse service to work over it, we have a huge problem. Different use of technology, different bandwidth requirements.
IF, and that's a big IF, AT&T decides to make an app, they certainly won't be dishing out the content from the user's home. There is a reason why the video NOC for U-Verse is in Kansas. And by NOT pushing out data from every single home, they can compress and shape the data better. AT&T will be able to push video content to the iPhone through 3G with considerably less bandwidth costs than Slingbox.
But no, let's go conspiracy theory instead. Never mind the streaming verbiage has been in the TOS since the beginning of time, it's just modified to better represent a technology that is coming up. Randall Stephenson is just laughing in his office in One Bell here in Dallas, rolling around in piles of ill gotten gains, deciding what to do once he takes over every phone company. I bet he's going to start ripping out all the fiber and forcing everyone back to copper, rotary dial, and Bertha at the CO will have to route calls again. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to KrK
Its going to be a pay to play network.
AT&T and others are opening 'app stores' for a reason.
They can 'certify' applications for a network vs. a platform. This will be a crippling move for users, and money maker (on many fronts) for carriers.
Eg. Skype can run over 3G on Windows Mobile, but not for iPhone. Its not because it won't work, its because the carrier / app store agreed to not let it work.
The days of open applications are nearing an end. |
|
Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| reply to psx_defector
said by psx_defector :said by Matt :If AT&T prohibits me from "slinging" my TV signal over 3G, but allows their U-Verse service to work over it, we have a huge problem. Different use of technology, different bandwidth requirements. It's the 3G network they are worried about, not the users pushing 1Mbps across their wired backbone. |
|
psx_defector
join:2001-06-09
Allen, TX
| They also care about people streaming crap from their houses. It's just more immediate with the 3G network.
They ain't about to allow streaming from home. If they decide to make their own streaming app for the iPhone, it's going to ride the U-Verse network from the tower. No one in their right minds would allow for such a large bandwidth hog if they didn't have a way to reduce costs. |
|
Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| said by psx_defector :They also care about people streaming crap from their houses. It's just more immediate with the 3G network. They ain't about to allow streaming from home. If they decide to make their own streaming app for the iPhone, it's going to ride the U-Verse network from the tower. No one in their right minds would allow for such a large bandwidth hog if they didn't have a way to reduce costs. Then why was the Orb streaming application, or any number of webcam streaming applications approved? The retail OrbLive application can do the exact same thing as the Slingbox. |
|
psx_defector
join:2001-06-09
Allen, TX | Probably because they don't suck down the bandwidth like Sling does. 512Kbps spread over a bunch of people per tower does not equal happy usage for all. I'm not familiar with Orb, but I would bet the bandwidth necessary for use is much smaller. |
|
