Possible PCCW network problems?

Author	All Replies
sam123 join:2009-04-25	Possible PCCW network problems? Hi Would any network gurus care to opine on the following pathping and dslreports.com line quality testing results on a Netvigator service? **************************** C:\Documents and Settings\user3>pathping -n yahoo.com Tracing route to yahoo.com [68.180.206.184] over a maximum of 30 hops: 0 119.237.149.156 1 116.48.72.254 2 219.76.118.18 3 218.102.21.222 4 63.218.2.13 5 63.218.179.34 6 216.115.107.59 7 209.131.32.17 8 68.180.206.184 Computing statistics for 200 seconds... Source to Here This Node/Link Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address 0 119.237.149.156 0/ 100 = 0% \| 1 26ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 116.48.72.254 0/ 100 = 0% \| 2 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% 219.76.118.18 0/ 100 = 0% \| 3 31ms 1/ 100 = 1% 1/ 100 = 1% 218.102.21.222 0/ 100 = 0% \| 4 36ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 63.218.2.13 0/ 100 = 0% \| 5 174ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 63.218.179.34 0/ 100 = 0% \| 6 189ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 216.115.107.59 0/ 100 = 0% \| 7 187ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 209.131.32.17 0/ 100 = 0% \| 8 171ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 68.180.206.184 Trace complete. **************************** C:\Documents and Settings\user3>pathping -n google.com Tracing route to google.com [74.125.67.100] over a maximum of 30 hops: 0 119.237.149.156 1 116.48.72.254 2 219.76.118.18 3 218.102.21.222 4 219.76.106.2 5 218.189.106.50 6 64.233.175.209 7 209.85.249.236 8 209.85.248.131 9 72.14.233.117 10 209.85.240.225 11 209.85.240.225 12 72.14.239.90 13 209.85.254.249 14 209.85.255.194 15 * * * Computing statistics for 375 seconds... Source to Here This Node/Link Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address 0 119.237.149.156 0/ 100 = 0% \| 1 26ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 116.48.72.254 0/ 100 = 0% \| 2 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% 219.76.118.18 0/ 100 = 0% \| 3 27ms 4/ 100 = 4% 4/ 100 = 4% 218.102.21.222 0/ 100 = 0% \| 4 28ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 219.76.106.2 0/ 100 = 0% \| 5 28ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 218.189.106.50 0/ 100 = 0% \| 6 34ms 14/ 100 = 14% 14/ 100 = 14% 64.233.175.209 0/ 100 = 0% \| 7 79ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 209.85.249.236 0/ 100 = 0% \| 8 175ms 10/ 100 = 10% 10/ 100 = 10% 209.85.248.131 0/ 100 = 0% \| 9 224ms 8/ 100 = 8% 8/ 100 = 8% 72.14.233.117 0/ 100 = 0% \| 10 219ms 10/ 100 = 10% 10/ 100 = 10% 209.85.240.225 0/ 100 = 0% \| 11 219ms 18/ 100 = 18% 18/ 100 = 18% 209.85.240.225 0/ 100 = 0% \| 12 235ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 72.14.239.90 74/ 100 = 74% \| 13 245ms 76/ 100 = 76% 2/ 100 = 2% 209.85.254.249 0/ 100 = 0% \| 14 234ms 74/ 100 = 74% 0/ 100 = 0% 209.85.255.194 26/ 100 = 26% \| 15 --- 100/ 100 =100% 0/ 100 = 0% 0.0.0.0 Trace complete. **************************** dslreports.com line quality testing result: »/linequality/nil/2514310 **************************** (1) Does it appear that there's a packet loss/latency problem somewhere within the PCCW network? (2) Is it likely that the problem is unrelated to the local DSL loop? Thanks in advance. Sam
sam123 join:2009-04-25	to forum · permalink · · 2009-04-25 11:56:06 ·


Saturday, 28-Nov 21:21:30	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF