Search:  

 
theme to black backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Anti-Community Broadband Bills Return » Why dont
Search Topic:
 Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Won't pass »
« NC, broadband, etc  
AuthorAll Replies

ZZink

join:2002-06-16
Etobicoke		reply to Edrick
Re: Why dont

Yay for creating more monopolies! Elitist for the win.
to forum · permalink · · 2009-03-31 14:57:35 · Reply to this

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
said by ZZink See Profile :

Yay for creating more monopolies! Elitist for the win.
LOL.

The only broadband Viagra needed is to separate the content from the delivery and make the last mile common carrier.
to forum · permalink · · 2009-03-31 15:15:34 · Reply to this


packetscan
Premium
join:2004-10-19
Bridgeport, CT
clubs:
·Optimum Online
said by RadioDoc See Profile :

said by ZZink See Profile :

Yay for creating more monopolies! Elitist for the win.
LOL.

The only broadband Viagra needed is to separate the content from the delivery and make the last mile common carrier.
That is a bit of a laugh.
--
Reach out and Tap someone!
to forum · permalink · · 2009-04-01 06:31:04 · Reply to this

Mr Matt

join:2008-01-29
Eustis, FL
·Comcast
·Embarq

reply to RadioDoc
Regulations should be passed that force Broadband Internet Access to be delivered the same way Dial-Up Internet Access was delivered.

Before the widespread deployment of broadband internet access, a Dial Up ISP would order PRI's from the local telephone company and use them for incoming access by customers. There was a point when competitive local exchange carriers competed with incumbent local exchange carriers and actually drove the monthly cost of PRI's down. I know because I ordered PRI's and the reduction in cost was about 40%.

In the new environment, regulation would force cable and telephone companies to open up their networks at reasonable regulated prices to ISP's, then prohibit Cable and Telephone Companies from providing Internet Access. The other alternative is to split the Cable and Telephone companies into switching, content and transport providers.
to forum · permalink · · 2009-04-01 10:08:02 · Reply to this
-
Forums » Anti-Community Broadband Bills ReturnWon't pass »
« NC, broadband, etc  

Friday, 27-Nov 14:24:34 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [119] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [60] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [38] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· Bell offering 175M service :) [TekSavvy]