republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » comments on review of SureWest Internet » Should be FIber
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


jadebangle
Premium
join:2007-05-22
Olathe, KS
·SureWest Internet
·AT&T Yahoo
·Comcast

reply to hottboiinnc
Re: Should be FIber

said by hottboiinnc See Profile :

When SureWest took over your provider they said it was FTTH. You may want to recheck that.
They didn't take over my provider they became my 3rd provider

hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
interesting because you reviewed them as a company that they took over.


jadebangle
Premium
join:2007-05-22
Olathe, KS
·SureWest Internet
·AT&T Yahoo
·Comcast

said by hottboiinnc See Profile :

interesting because you reviewed them as a company that they took over.
I wish they did then most of us would be on fiber optic symmetrical connection by now
superior to asymmetrical that aren't design for uploading, big on download, small on upload.
Like ethernet 100/100 in both direction
Full Duplex ethernet is 200/200 in both direction

hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
·Time Warner Cable
·buckeye cable

Again. the company you have reviewed: Surewest WAS actually Everest as even your links above say that. And you should read this:

Are you making enhancements in Kansas City now that SureWest has acquired the company?

On the network side in Kansas City, we plan to add 2,000 new residential homes on the hybrid fiber-coax network while creating a fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) network starting with a release of 8,000 FTTH homes in 2008 that will deliver enhanced bandwidth capabilities on the network to improve our data and video products.

They're HFC network in areas but also FTTH which Surewest is known for.

You're actually provider is NEVER SureWest until recently. It was a local company. SureWest just bought them.

Which does NOT make SureWest your 3rd provider/option just because they bought someone else. Also you don't count Telco's U-Crap as an "option".


jadebangle
Premium
join:2007-05-22
Olathe, KS
·SureWest Internet
·AT&T Yahoo
·Comcast

said by hottboiinnc See Profile :

Again. the company you have reviewed: Surewest WAS actually Everest as even your links above say that. And you should read this:

Are you making enhancements in Kansas City now that SureWest has acquired the company?

On the network side in Kansas City, we plan to add 2,000 new residential homes on the hybrid fiber-coax network while creating a fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) network starting with a release of 8,000 FTTH homes in 2008 that will deliver enhanced bandwidth capabilities on the network to improve our data and video products.

They're HFC network in areas but also FTTH which Surewest is known for.

You're actually provider is NEVER SureWest until recently. It was a local company. SureWest just bought them.

Which does NOT make SureWest your 3rd provider/option just because they bought someone else. Also you don't count Telco's U-Crap as an "option".
surewest is my 3rd provider that provide telephone, tv and fiber internet
They were nonexistent not long ago
I still have att and comcast
I can have all three now lol but its costly
everestkc aka everest kansas city is not my previous provider
everest was bought out or taken over by surewest due to how successful they are in california area
everest is a cable tv and copper based internet company that has never served in my location, they serve only in kansas city which is like 150 miles away

so yes I am correct I am still with ATT and Comcast
surewest is now my 3rd provider

End of story.

fredwilson12

join:2005-04-20
Sacramento, CA

reply to jadebangle
Full Duplex ethernet is 200/200 in both direction

Full duplex ethernet is still 100mbps in each direction. The concept of full duplex (vs. half duplex) does not increase the amount of bandwidth available, but just allows the bandwidth to travel in each direction at the same time. Effectively, you can be transferring data @ 100Mbps between hosts in both directions (i.e. uploading and downloading) at the same time. So collectively you can get 200Mbps if you add both the uploading and downloading, but it is not 200Mbps each way.
-
Forums » comments on review of SureWest Internet


Tuesday, 24-Nov 04:44:04 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [84] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [54] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [29] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [26] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [13] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [12] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [7] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· DIR-655 1.32 firmware - DNS relay issue (fixed) [D-Link]
· IE8 InPrivate filter from adblock plus list [Microsoft Help]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]