Re: Let it die - dslreports.com

Author	All Replies
NetAdmin CCNA join:2008-05-22	reply to texans20 Re: Let it die said by texans20 : Please, it's a bad idea let it stay dead. Or at least drop the "smut free" part of it. -- "This is a bus. You know how big a bus is?"
NetAdmin CCNA join:2008-05-22	to forum · permalink · · 2008-12-29 14:43:21 ·
Skippy25 join:2000-09-13 Hazelwood, MO	I would agree, drop the smut free part and don't allow the big 4 wireless players to bid or buy any company that wins it for the 10 years they have to deploy it.
Skippy25 join:2000-09-13 Hazelwood, MO	to forum · permalink · · 2008-12-29 14:52:58 ·
ISurfTooMuch join:2007-04-23 Tuscaloosa, AL	reply to NetAdmin I agree. The government has no business telling people what they can and can't see online. I'd have no problem with a requirement that the operator offer filtering to those who ask for it, but I don't like mandated filtering one bit. And for those who say that the government has a right to ask for mandated filtering in exchange for the right to use the spectrum, which is a public resource, it isn't a great stretch for the federal or local governments to demand the same concessions to allow companies to use public rights-of-way to build wired networks. Once you let the censorship genie out of the bottle, it'll be almost impossible to get it back in.
ISurfTooMuch join:2007-04-23 Tuscaloosa, AL	to forum · permalink · · 2008-12-29 15:32:24 ·


Saturday, 28-Nov 06:34:55	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF