<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: So BT blocks certain forum topics - plenty of other places in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21468415</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:41:00 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:41:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: So BT blocks certain forum topics - plenty of other places</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21469813</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1365270"><b>devnuller</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>In fact BBR has similar rules allowing deletion of messages without a reason being needed:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/faq/site">Site FAQ</A> &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/8954">Terms of Use for DSLR</A><br></div>I always find it interesting when posts are not deleted even though they are blatant flaming / personal attacks and have been "hey mod"'d.  I guess it depends on who is being flamed.<br><br>[expecting this posted to be deleted any time now.... kind of ironic given this topic isn't it?]]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21469813</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:46:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: So BT blocks certain forum topics - plenty of other places</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21469733</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/289340"><b>raw</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  yock <A HREF="/useremail/u/246096"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>As much as I detest the idea of squelching discussion, Internet forums are private property and not bastions of free speech. They have every right to prohibit some topics of conversation if they want.<br><br>Besides, BT will incur more negative press from the practice.<br> </div>Agreed.  It's incredibly stupid and stinks of head-in-the-sand management, but it's certainly within the discretion of just about any forum's TOS.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21469733</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:21:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: So BT blocks certain forum topics - plenty of other places</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21468415</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1256792"><b>Necronomikro</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Even if BT doesn't permit certain subjects to be debated on <b>THEIR</b> support forums, so what? There are only about 10,000 other places where the subject can be debated. It isn't like it is limiting free speech - because that is a charge that can only be laid against the government and not a private company.<br> </div>No, that is something that can be leveled against anyone - it just happens that the government isn't allowed to do it(in the US), but, private forums are. Cowardly of them to squelch criticism.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21468415</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:03:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: So BT blocks certain forum topics - plenty of other places</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21468405</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/567879"><b>Kearnstd</b></A> : BT does hold a right to remove a topic saying somethey do sucks just as Blizzard does on their offical World of Warcraft forums.  pretty much if you need to complain about a company it is best to do it on a 3rd party forum, because short of legal action or a gross violation of site policy a forum like this wont delete a post.<br><small>--<br>[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21468405</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:01:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: So BT blocks certain forum topics - plenty of other places</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21468028</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  yock <A HREF="/useremail/u/246096"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>As much as I detest the idea of squelching discussion, Internet forums are private property and not bastions of free speech. They have every right to prohibit some topics of conversation if they want.<br> </div>Indeed.<br><br>What BT is doing is accepted procedure for all discussion web sites. In fact BBR has similar rules allowing deletion of messages without a reason being needed:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/faq/site">Site FAQ</A> &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/8954">Terms of Use for DSLR</A><br><div class="bquote">DSLR/BBR may reject, refuse to post or delete any Content for any or no reason...<br><br>DSLR/BBR reserves the right to investigate and take appropriate legal action against anyone who violates Terms of Use or the provisions below, including without limitation, and in DSLR/BBR's sole discretion removing the offending Content from the DSLR/BBR site and terminating the Membership of such violators.</div><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21468028</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:11:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: So BT blocks certain forum topics - plenty of other places</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21467987</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/246096"><b>yock</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Even if BT doesn't permit certain subjects to be debated on <b>THEIR</b> support forums, so what? There are only about 10,000 other places where the subject can be debated. It isn't like it is limiting free speech - because that is a charge that can only be laid against the government and not a private company.<br> </div>As much as I detest the idea of squelching discussion, Internet forums are private property and not bastions of free speech. They have every right to prohibit some topics of conversation if they want.<br><br>Besides, BT will incur more negative press from the practice.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21467987</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:56:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>So BT blocks certain forum topics - plenty of other places</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21467837</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : Even if BT doesn't permit certain subjects to be debated on <b>THEIR</b> support forums, so what? There are only about 10,000 other places where the subject can be debated. It isn't like it is limiting free speech - because that is a charge that can only be laid against the government and not a private company.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21467837</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:07:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
