republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Cisco » [Config] site to site VPN issues using Cisco ASA 5500 to Router
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
7410
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
ASA Admin Account »
« Adjusting 871w Throughput For FTP File Transfer  
AuthorAll Replies


rsreese

join:2004-02-17
Saint Augustine, FL

[Config] site to site VPN issues using Cisco ASA 5500 to Router

Hey everyone I've been having a bit of a snag when trying to connect to point via VPN. One end is a ASA5505 and the other is a 3725 router. The network on the router side I'm trying to access is 172.16.2.x and on the ASA side 172.31.12.x.

I am able to initiate the connection from the ASA side but not from the router side. I am unable to transfer any data between to two hosts:

There no pong to my ping requests though. Also I've tried other services that fail. Here are my configurations. If anyone see's anything wrong feel free to let me know :-).

router

ASA

kubaff

join:2007-06-14
kenya

Re: [Config] site to site VPN issues using Cisco ASA 5500 to Rou

you need to EXCLUDE the INTERESTING traffic from being NAT'd on the router. Use an extended AccessList and make sure it's the FIRST ACL to be processed

ip nat inside source list 1 interface FastEthernet0/0 overload

# access-list 1 permit 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255
# access-list 1 permit 172.16.3.0 0.0.0.255

Change ACL to

access-list xx deny 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list xx deny 172.16.3.0 0.0.0.255 172.31.12.0 0.0.0.255
access-list xx permit 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list xx permit 172.16.3.0 0.0.0.255 any

ip nat inside source list x interface FastEthernet0/0 overload


rsreese

join:2004-02-17
Saint Augustine, FL

reply to rsreese
kubaff,

I changed the ACL for NAT as you mentioned to the following extended ACL's but it still didn't work:

Any other ideas?

aryoba
Premium,MVM
join:2002-08-22

There is this forum FAQ link providing IPSec tunnel sample configuration between PIX (or ASA) and router.

»Cisco Forum FAQ »Various Site-to-Site IPSec VPN: Cisco, Juniper, Checkpoint, Sonicwall, Zywall


rsreese

join:2004-02-17
Saint Augustine, FL


1 edit
reply to rsreese
I've been able to connect to the ASA to other ASA and PIX devices but not to the router. I imagine is something like a ACL issue or something I'm missing. Thanks for the links though.

I'm assuming since the ASA side can initiate the connection that there is a problem with the router side of things.

kubaff

join:2007-06-14
kenya

reply to rsreese
It's all in the NATing. I had a similar situation between a PIX and 2811

You need to make sure that the INTERESTING TRAFFIC in EXCLUDED from the Global NAT statement. In addition the "reverse" ACL (10) attached to the Crypto map.

access-list 10 permit 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 10 permit 172.16.3.0 0.0.0.255 172.31.12.0 0.0.0.255

crypto map CLIENTMAP 1 ipsec-isakmp
set peer 1.1.1.1
set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
match address 10

access-list 11 deny 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 11 deny 172.16.3.0 0.0.0.255 172.31.12.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 11 permit 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 11 permit 172.16.3.0 0.0.0.255 any

ip nat inside source list 11 interface FastEthernet0/0 overload


rsreese

join:2004-02-17
Saint Augustine, FL


1 edit
kubaff,

I did something similar but used extended ACL's since standard didn't allow for the source IP to be listed:

access-list 150 deny ip 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 172.31.12.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 150 permit ip 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 150 permit ip 172.16.3.0 0.0.0.255 any

I actually got the whole thing to work at one point last night by setting 'set pfs group1' to 'crypto map CLIENTMAP 1 ipsec-isakmp' but then I changed something when cleaning up and broke it. Slightly frustrating...

Here's the most recent config for the router:


kubaff

join:2007-06-14
kenya
reply to rsreese
Ran the CLEAR CRYPTO IPSEC SA

Could you display

- sh crypto isakmp sa
- sh crypto isakmp ipsec

You could be having issues with IPSEC;

- debug crypto ipsec

kubaff

join:2007-06-14
kenya
reply to rsreese

sorry...

sh crypto ipsec sa


rsreese

join:2004-02-17
Saint Augustine, FL
reply to rsreese
It was a issue with my connection renewing the lease on the IP.

thejipster

join:2008-05-20

reply to rsreese
FYI, I know you have solved this issue. This is mainly for other who run into this issue in the future.
IPSEC router has pfs disabled by default.

Problem is that Cisco IOS IPSEC router will be able to accept PFS from the peer even if PFS is disabled.

But if ASA has PFS enabled, IPSEC router will fail the IPSEC negotiation since ASA will reject the IPSEC negotiation.

That explains the one-directional IPSEC setup issue.


rsreese

join:2004-02-17
Saint Augustine, FL
Thanks for the heads up. I realized that PFS was a issue between the two devices after many hours of trouble shooting
-
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » CiscoASA Admin Account »
« Adjusting 871w Throughput For FTP File Transfer  


Friday, 20-Nov 20:41:58 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [112] Verizon Again Hints At Metered Billing
· [84] Spain Declares Broadband A Legal Right
· [78] There's Still No Evidence That Metered Billing Is Necessary
· [76] Will AOL's Implosion Ever End?
· [74] Verizon To Be Tested By Unofficial Droid Tethering
· [73] Femtocells Are A No Show
· [71] Deploying FTTH Without Digging Things Up
· [66] Verizon To AT&T: The Truth Hurts
· [60] Chicago Tribune Visits 'Comcast University'
· [53] Feds Crack Down On Gift Card Trickery
Most people now reading
· Town to photograph EVERY car that enters and leaves [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [WIN7] microsoft 7 [Microsoft Help]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· CTV & Canwest ask CRTC to order blocking of U.S. programs [TekSavvy]
· Seems like a good deal [Home Repair & Improvement]