Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Sprint, Cogent in Peering Feud » Peering needs to change
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
203
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Typical Cogent »
AuthorAll Replies


peeringisdead

@comcast.net

Peering needs to change

Sprint is a little man with a big ego. They are no longer a real Internet player and only carry a relatively small amount of the Internet traffic.

The reality is "peering" as we know it needs to go away and all Internet traffic should have economic and actual costs/business measures associated with it based on how long the ISP carries the traffic from source to destination.

Just because you are now a Tier1, doesn't mean you should be. The Tier system is completely broken and needs to be flushed.


espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
·voip.ms
·Vitelity VOIP
·Callcentric
·VoiceStick
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
·Embarq

said by peeringisdead :

Sprint is a little man with a big ego. They are no longer a real Internet player and only carry a relatively small amount of the Internet traffic.
The facts tend to show Sprint has a massive customer base worldwide and is reasonably well peered.

»www.renesys.com/products_service···ple_data

»www.fixedorbit.com/metrics.htm

»www.fixedorbit.com/stats.htm


peeringisdead

@comcast.net

said by espaeth See Profile :

The facts tend to show Sprint has a massive customer base worldwide and is reasonably well peered.
That may be true, but the peering is legacy and customer base has been changing over the past few years. Many of these customers are very small or use Sprint for very little data (ask around).

ASN metrics are tricky and not sure they are a complete measurement of an entity proportion of "Internet" volume. e.g 20 ASNs with 200G of data vs 1000 ASNs with a combined total of 160G of data. Which is bigger?

audiog

join:2004-08-09
Detroit, MI

reply to peeringisdead
Tell that to the FCC who wants the cost system to go away because it would cost THE NEW AT&T and VERIZON a lot of money each month. The cost system was based on the terminating carrier (and the peers are carriers ) charging the originating carrier a fee based on a cost model. And the new system favors AT&T and Verizon. The new system that is being hashed out reduces the rates by a factor of 1000 and says that the internet has no cost the terminating carrier when in fact the peering if done by fiber or copper DS interconnects and by FCC rules if they( AT&T and Verizon) say you have to run fiber to me at this point( that is not cost effective to you ) that is your only choice.

hescominsoon

join:2003-02-18
Brunswick, MD
·Comcast
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to peeringisdead
said by peeringisdead :

Sprint is a little man with a big ego. They are no longer a real Internet player and only carry a relatively small amount of the Internet traffic.

The reality is "peering" as we know it needs to go away and all Internet traffic should have economic and actual costs/business measures associated with it based on how long the ISP carries the traffic from source to destination.

Just because you are now a Tier1, doesn't mean you should be. The Tier system is completely broken and needs to be flushed.
the reality is cogent routinely tries to violate it's peering agreements by sending more traffic over peering links than they receive. This results in de-peering as it well should. What then happens is cogent then pays the difference it exceeded the peering agreement(as it should) and things go back to normal.
--
God Blesshttp://www.emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com-- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape"


53059959
Temp banned from BBR more then anyone

join:2002-10-02
PwnZone
reply to espaeth
network neutrality

This is sprint trying to create a tiered internet.

They think their traffic is of higher quality then Cogent, so they block Cogent.

All this does is force providers to move away from both companies.


atlantan

@atlanticnexus.net

reply to peeringisdead
Re: Peering needs to change

said by peeringisdead :

said by espaeth See Profile :

The facts tend to show Sprint has a massive customer base worldwide and is reasonably well peered.
... Many of these customers are very small or use Sprint for very little data (ask around)...
Actually Sprint has large customers that move massive amounts of data, like Coke and Raytheon.
-
Forums » Sprint, Cogent in Peering FeudTypical Cogent »


Saturday, 28-Nov 18:21:04 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [70] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [64] Weekend Open Thread
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Future9] Future9 status [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· how to use the 2nd line with phone hooked to the 1st line? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Gizmo5 has added a Google Voice section in its members area. [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]