Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » VoIP Vulnerabilities Being Exposed Today » Excellent!!
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« illusion of privacy  
nitzan
Premium,VIP
join:2008-02-27
·ViaTalk
·Comcast

Re: Excellent!!

said by anony101 :

Keep in mind however that the only ones who can "listen in" on your calls are your ISP, our ISP, and the phone companies on the way. None of which are going to bother filtering through millions of minutes of call time.
That's not accurate. Cable customers can listen in to unencrypted VOIP calls within the same node they're in which means their neighborhood.
I could be wrong, but AFAIK your neighbors CANNOT sniff your packets. Unless they have access to the switch - which they don't - they cannot listen in on you.

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


1 edit

Re: Excellent!!

said by nitzan See Profile :

said by anony101 :

Keep in mind however that the only ones who can "listen in" on your calls are your ISP, our ISP, and the phone companies on the way. None of which are going to bother filtering through millions of minutes of call time.
That's not accurate. Cable customers can listen in to unencrypted VOIP calls within the same node they're in which means their neighborhood.
I could be wrong, but AFAIK your neighbors CANNOT sniff your packets. Unless they have access to the switch - which they don't - they cannot listen in on you.
You couldn't do it on the PC side of the cable modem. But if you hook up a device directly to the cable and bypass the cable modem altogether with a sniffer device, you could see and capture the packets on your local node.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?
nitzan
Premium,VIP
join:2008-02-27

Re: Excellent!!

Interesting. Didn't know that.

So essentially, cable internet is inherently less secure than, say, DSL? or better yet - FTTH?

Cthen

join:2004-08-01
Ypsilanti, MI
·Comcast

Re: Excellent!!

said by nitzan See Profile :

Interesting. Didn't know that.

So essentially, cable internet is inherently less secure than, say, DSL? or better yet - FTTH?
Since when has the internet ever been secure on any ISP? Just because some connections go through the CO first doesn't mean some one can't tap into it along the way.

pfak
Premium
join:2002-12-29
Canada
·Shaw
·Novus Entertainmen..

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

You couldn't do it on the PC side of the cable modem. But if you hook up a device directly to the cable and bypass the cable modem altogether with a sniffer device, you could see and capture the packets on your local node.
Look up BPI+.

Sometimes I really wish DSLR had a moderation system like Slashdot so all your posts would be "-1"
--
Xenophase - British Columbia's premier online gaming community.

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: Excellent!!

There is no protection against tampering with the signals on the RF cable network.

The main advantages of BPI+ in DOCSIS 1.1 is the capability to upgrade crypto mechanisms in already deployed Cable Modems and the use of digital certificates to authenticate Cable Modems.

Notice also that all setup and configuration of the BPI functions are made at the CMTS, so as a user you have very little control over when your data are encrypted and when they are not. In reality the purpose of BPI and BPI+ is this

* To protect against theft of service
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?

anony101

@comcast.net

I could be wrong, but AFAIK your neighbors CANNOT sniff your packets. Unless they have access to the switch - which they don't - they cannot listen in on you.
You ARE wrong.

Why don't you do some READING on the subject. That will save you from posting misinformation which some here will assume is correct.
Forums » VoIP Vulnerabilities Being Exposed Today« illusion of privacy  


Wednesday, 25-Nov 02:59:35 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [103] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [84] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [39] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [32] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [20] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
· [16] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Rant] Damn Sermons through my speakers! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Mysterious $800 Cash Deposit? [General Questions]
· IE8 InPrivate filter from adblock plus list [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· "ISP owners could face jail under child porn bill" - CBC [Canadian Broadband]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· CTV & Canwest ask CRTC to order blocking of U.S. programs [TekSavvy]
· Several MS Updates today (11/24/2009). [Security]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]