  Dogfather Altitude is your friend Premium join:2007-12-26 Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·MegaPath
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·Verizon west (ex G..
·ViaTalk
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable
edit: September 17th, @12:34PM
| reply to HiVolt Re: [WCG] 8 Core Xeon not crunching at full capacity
I'm assuming you've shown yourself "all processes" and not just "my processes" to see if something else is taking up the other 15%.
Also what happens if you open a 9th crunching instance (if you can do such a thing)?
There is also uncertainty principle in monitoring this usage but it shouldn't be anywhere near 15%. In my quad activity monitor for example takes 1.5% typically. |
|
 ajeb Premium join:2002-04-18 Norristown, PA clubs:  | Skeedatl is right...that 15% is going somewhere into the system. You should be able to find in all processes. There was a huge system update just released..is it downloading in background? Though I can't see that taking up that much cpu. |
|
  HiVolt Premium join:2000-12-28 Toronto, ON clubs:
·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Bell Sympatico
| This happened before the 10.5.5 also. I have looked under All Processes, and I don't see it. Here's a screenshot. -- ,,!,,('-'),,!,, |
|
  HiVolt Premium join:2000-12-28 Toronto, ON clubs:
·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Bell Sympatico
| And here's output from "top" in terminal.
-- ,,!,,('-'),,!,, |
|
  bbarrera Premium,MVM join:2000-10-23 Sacramento, CA clubs:
| Next time run "top -o cpu" to sort highest CPU processes first.
Might want to check the 'nice' level of BOINC client and renice if possible. I've never understood the Mac OS X process scheduler, and there is a website with some good info (believe it is Amit Singh of Google). |
|
  HiVolt Premium join:2000-12-28 Toronto, ON clubs:
·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Bell Sympatico
| said by bbarrera :Might want to check the 'nice' level of BOINC client and renice if possible. I've never understood the Mac OS X process scheduler, and there is a website with some good info (believe it is Amit Singh of Google). Can you explain how do I go about doing that? -- ,,!,,('-'),,!,, |
|
  Dogfather Altitude is your friend Premium join:2007-12-26 Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·MegaPath
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·Verizon west (ex G..
·ViaTalk
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable
edit: September 17th, @05:05PM
| »www.macosxhints.com/article.php?···85034927
I've also see a few utilities in my Google search like BeNicer »www.versiontracker.com/dyn/morei···sx/16534 that claim to make the process a bit quicker.
EDIT - Just toyed with BeNicer and it may not like Leo...I get some errors and VT showed it only supported Tiger and earlier. |
|
 ajeb Premium join:2002-04-18 Norristown, PA clubs:  | This can't be this hard...lol.
I'm running 99.3% to 100% on all eight cores. My process list looks the same as yours. The only thing seems to be that I'm using an older version of BOINC. |
|
  HiVolt Premium join:2000-12-28 Toronto, ON clubs:
·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Bell Sympatico
| said by ajeb :This can't be this hard...lol. I'm running 99.3% to 100% on all eight cores. My process list looks the same as yours. The only thing seems to be that I'm using an older version of BOINC. I was running the same version of BOINC before, it was doing the same thing, so I downloaded the latest...
Now, I've been thinking a bit... When I got this new 8-Core Mac Pro, I was upgrading my main workstation from a 4-Core Mac Pro that was moved to another part of the office... Now, All I did was move the hard drive over, it booted right up and I didn't think anything of it. Everything else has been working fine.
Could the Kernel or something else not be handling the 8-cores properly because of this, and not letting a low priority process like BOINC access 100% of the cores when the system is idle?
Could an archive & install from the DVD's that came with the 8-Core (10.5.4) do the trick perhaps? -- ,,!,,('-'),,!,, |
|
  Dogfather Altitude is your friend Premium join:2007-12-26 Laguna Hills, CA | Try downloading the combo update for 10.5.5 which just came out yesterday. Perhaps there will be some magic in there for ya. |
|
 ajeb Premium join:2002-04-18 Norristown, PA clubs: 
·Verizon FIOS
| reply to HiVolt Your using all cores so the system knows they're there. I can't see why the kernel would be written to handle them all.
How about the EFI firmware update?
»support.apple.com/kb/HT1237
Repair permission?
»www.macworld.com/article/52220/2···ons.html
Just throwing out things now...lol.
I've been reading message boards for other projects using MAC and compiled a list of the stupid things.
Are you using local preferences or web preferences? Things seem to run better for most with setting the preferences on the website of the project not locally. I set that up using the custom option of device profile on the WCG website. I have two profiles, one for my MAC, the other for my PCs. I found that Protein folding took forever to run and blocked it running on the MAC.
Screen saver set to never? Run always in activity pull down?
I'll keep looking. |
|
  HiVolt Premium join:2000-12-28 Toronto, ON clubs: | What i'll do when I have some free time is to install a fresh OS copy on a spare hard drive... I have a feeling it's got something to do with me just transferring the hard drive from the old Mac Pro. -- ,,!,,('-'),,!,, |
|
  HiVolt Premium join:2000-12-28 Toronto, ON clubs:
·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Bell Sympatico
edit: September 23rd, @10:46AM
| Well, I had some free time today at work so I installed a clean copy of Leopard 10.5.4 (that came with the new Mac Pro). After installation, the first thing I did was Install Boinc...
After running the test benchmarks at 100% on all 8 cores, once all 8 work units of HCC populated the spots, it dropped down from 100% to 85%.
I'm at a loss for words. Is this beast of a machine simply not cut out for crunching? I don't get it...
Edit: I also have XP Pro installed on this machine, and I just rebooted into it and installed Boinc, and it's happily crunching on all 8 cores. WTF is wrong with the Mac version? -- GO LEAFS GO! |
|