<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Telus dsl will be useless in the future in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21120648</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:27:28 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:27:28 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Telus dsl will be useless in the future</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21120648</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I guess the implicit suggestion you are making by saying "Telus dsl will be useless in the future" is that TELUS either isn't or won't be upgrading their DSL or infrastructure in the future.  I've seen too much talk on the forums about VDSL, bonding, and GPON to believe they aren't doing so. So I think your statement is invalid.<br><br>Besides, the CBC writing an article to their left-biased target audience about a study funded Cisco trying to encourage any telco to spend more isn't much in the way of proof.<br><br>CT]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21120648</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:19:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Telus dsl will be useless in the future</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21119786</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Yes i've been reading dsl with ping times above 60 milliseconds will be completely useless in the future. With the ping times at Telus being the highest in the entire world where will Telus dsl be in the future? Cited article is here for proof.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/09/15/tech-broadband.html" >www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008&middot;&middot;&middot;and.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21119786</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:56:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
