<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Netgear WGR614v7 changes its own IP address? in Netgear</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21079554</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:47:43 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:47:43 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Netgear WGR614v7 changes its own IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21122403</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/708581"><b>Timo_D</b></A> : I would set the home and work IP's to use a different range of IP's.  Otherwise I will bet that part of the confusion will be with her machine as it gets confused on where it needs to send its packets.<br><br>Set up work to be 192.168.1.0/24, and home to be something different like 192.168.2.0/24.  You can use the same SSIDs etc but that way the laptop can tell that it needs to refresh its network settings.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21122403</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:25:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Netgear WGR614v7 changes its own IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21085633</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1035249"><b>jhgarrison</b></A> : The answer, from the Netgear support forums, is that the router will reconfigure itself to a new LAN netblock <br>if it detects a conflicting packet (i.e a script-kiddie<br>scanning for 192.168.1.x addresses) on the WAN interface.<br>The reason given for this behavior is that is transparently<br>handles things for clueless home users who try to attach it <br>to a DSL/Cable modem that already does NAT.<br><br>I would expect the provider to filter out unrouteable<br>addresses from the shared segment, but I guess AT&T <br>doesn't do this for their DSL customers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21085633</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:23:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Netgear WGR614v7 changes its own IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21079554</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1035249"><b>jhgarrison</b></A> : Anyone have an explanation for the following?<br><br>I help a friend (who is computer-clueless) with her office and home<br>wireless networks.  I installed WGR614v7 routers in both places, and<br>configured them myself to use the default 192.168.1.0/24 LAN address<br>block.  Today she called me and said she couldn't access the Internet<br>from any work computers.  I went over and found that the router's LAN<br>IP had changed to 10.0.0.1, and since the office machines hadn't been<br>rebooted or ipconfig /repair'ed they couldn't talk to it.<br><br>I reset the router to factory defaults and reconfigured it from<br>scratch, changing the WPA passphrase and admin password to 14-<br>character random strings for good measure.  I also double-checked the<br>remote-admin setting and confirmed that it is disabled.<br><br>I use the same configuration (SSID, admin PW and WPA passphrase) on<br>her home network so she isn't confused by multiple profiles when she<br>takes her laptop home. Given the changes on the work network it was<br>necessary to make the same security changes on the home router.<br><br>I walked her through the changes over the phone, and found that her<br>home router was ALSO reset to 10.0.0.1.  We successfully completed the<br>password/passphrase changes but I had her leave the router at 10.0.0.1<br>so I can examine it later this week and check for other suspicious<br>changes.<br><br>Questions<br><br>Are there any known bugs that would cause a WGR614v7 to change the LAN<br>settings on its own?<br><br>Are there any known vulnerabilities that would expose the router to<br>remote hacks even with remote admin disabled?<br><br>Are there any known viruses that infect PCs whose primary purpose is<br>to mess with wireless routers?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21079554</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:22:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
